Home About us Products Services Contact us Bookmark
:: wikimiki.org ::
World

World

:This article is about the World, meaning the Earth. For uses of the specific phrase "The World", see The World (disambiguation) The World (disambiguation)] The World (disambiguation) In English, world is rooted in a compound of the obsolete words were, man, and eld, age; thus, its oldest meaning is "age or life of man". Its primary modern meaning is the planet Earth, especially when capitalized: the World. In this sense, a world map is a map of the surface of the Earth. World can also refer to human population in general or to a distinct group of people.

Physical locations

In other contexts, "world" is sometimes used to mean any planet or moon; for example, Mars and Titan are two worlds within the solar system. "World" is sometimes used to refer to the entire Universe. This is less common now that knowledge of space is more commonplace; however, it is still used vaguely in this sense (as in "the whole wide world"), which it is actually the most frequent sense in philosophy.

Other meanings

World can be used in less literal words; for example, two people with very little in common are "living in two different worlds." The "end of the world" usually means "the end of everything I am familiar with."
- In Christianity
the world connotes the fallen and corrupt world order of human society outside the community of believers. The world is frequently cited alongside the flesh and the Devil as a source of temptation that Christians should flee. Monks speak of striving to be "in this world, but not of this world", and the term "worldhood" has been distinguished from "monkhood", the former being the status of merchants, farmers, and others who deal with "worldly" things.
-
World can also refer to a fictional setting, for example the world of Star Trek or the world of The Lord of the Rings. See fictional realm.
- In knowledge engineering and knowledge level modeling, a system's
world is the knowledge that system has about its environment.
- The term can also be used in a culturally specific context: commentators increasingly refer, for example, to the "Muslim world" as if it were a distinct entity.
- In Native American mythology, the Fifth World is the coming world that will exist after the current world.
-
World can refer to WORLD Magazine, the fourth largest newsweekly in the United States.
- In Europe, the word "World" refers to Europe (and sometimes America as well).

First World, Second World, Third World

Europe]] The terms First World, Second World, and Third World were used to divide the nations of Earth into three broad categories. The three terms did not arise simultaneously. After World War II it became common to speak of the capitalist and Communist countries as two major blocs, scarcely using such terms as the "free world" as compared to the "communist bloc". The two "worlds" were not numbered. It was eventually pointed out that there were a great many countries that fit into neither category, and in the 1950s this latter group came to be called the Third World. It then began to seem that there ought to be a "First World" and a "Second World." These latter terms were always much less common. In the context of the Cold War:
- First World refers to nations that were within the Western European and United States' sphere of influence — e.g., the NATO countries of North America and Western Europe, Japan, South Korea, and some of the former British colonies such as Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.
- Second World referred to nations within the Soviet Union's sphere of influence, principally the Warsaw Pact countries. Besides the Soviet Union proper, most of Eastern Europe was run by satellite governments working closely with Moscow. This term may or may not also refer to Communist countries whose leadership were at odds with Moscow, e.g. China and Yugoslavia. Recently, this term has been used to describe former Third World countries that have experienced too much development to be classified any longer as being a part of the Third World.
- Third World refers to nations within neither sphere of influence, who were often members of the Non-Aligned Movement. They were mostly developing countries, and many of them are located in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. They are often nations that were colonized by another nation in the past. After World War II, the First and Second Worlds struggled to expand their respective spheres of influence to the Third World. The militaries and intelligence services of the United States and the Soviet Union worked both secretly and overtly to influence Third World governments, with mixed success. There were a number of countries which did not fit comfortably into this neat definition of partition, including Switzerland, Sweden, and the Republic of Ireland, which chose to be neutral. Finland was under the Soviet Union's sphere of influence but was not communist, nor was it a member of the Warsaw Pact. Austria was under the United States' sphere of influence, but in 1955, when the country again became a fully independent republic, it did so under the condition that it remained neutral. With the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, the term "Second World" largely fell out of use, though the term "Third World" remains popular, mostly as another term for developing countries. The remaining Communist countries either became more isolated from the world economy, as in North Korea and Cuba, or began integrating capitalist concepts such as private enterprise into their societies and forging new trading ties with external capitalist economies, as in Vietnam and China. In more recent use, the term First World refers to developed nations, while Third World, in contrast, refers to developing/undeveloped nations. There is also the less commonly used term Fourth World, often used to refer to nations that lack any national representation at the UN, but that may enjoy representation at UNPO — indigenous peoples living within or across state boundaries. "The World" can also be used to refer to the group of people on the planet earth.

See also


- World economy Category:Culture Category:Geography Category:Universe ja:世界



Were

This article is about the word were. There is also a style of Muslim religions music called were. Were and wer are archaic terms for adult male humans and were often used for alliteration with wife as "were and wife". Another like pair in older English was "groom and girl". Since wife originally meant any female, bride was the more natural term for a married woman. The word world is derived from the words wer and yld (lifetime; cognate to English old), which translates literally as "age of man". In folklore and fantasy fiction, were- is often used as a prefix applied to an animal name to indicate a type of shapeshifter (e.g. "were-boar"). This usage can be seen as a back formation from werewolf (literally, "man-wolf"), as there is no equivalent wolfwife. A further back formation, polywere, eliminates the animal root entirely. In reference to this, the word "were" is also sometimes used as a term of self-identification by members of the therianthropy subculture, though in recent years this usage seems to be declining as more people become aware of its etymology (i.e. that without the animal suffix it simply means "man" rather than "shapeshifter"), and the term "therian" is now more commonly used in that context. (Main article: therianthropy) Were is related to the Latin loanwords virile and virtue which are derived from vir, a word for "man" or "hero".

See also


- Mannaz
- Werewolf
- Weregild Category:Etymology ja:Were

Planet

A planet is generally considered to be a relatively large mass of accreted matter in orbit around a star that is not a star itself. The name comes from the Greek term πλανήτης, planētēs, meaning "wanderer", as ancient astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. Based on historical consensus, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) lists nine planets in our solar system. Since the term "planet" has no precise scientific definition, however, many astronomers contest that figure. Some say it should be lowered to eight by removing Pluto from the list, whilst others claim it should be raised to fifteen, twenty, or even higher.

Planetary formation

It is not known with certainty how planets are formed. The prevailing theory is that they are formed from those remnants of a nebula that don't condense under gravity to form a protostar. Instead, these remnants become a thin disc of dust and gas revolving around the protostar and begin to condense about local concentrations of mass within the disc. These concentrations become ever more dense until they collapse inward under gravity to form protoplanets. When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, its solar wind blows away most of the disc's remaining material. Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become moons of larger planets. With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account.

Within our solar system

Main article: Solar system The process of naming planets and their features is known as planetary nomenclature. All the currently accepted planets in the solar system are named after Roman gods, except for Uranus (named after a Greek god) and the Earth, which was not seen as a planet by the ancients but rather the centre of the universe. The designated planetary names are near-universal in the Western world, but some non-European languages, such as Chinese, use their own. Moons are also named after gods and characters from classical mythology, or, in the case of Uranus, after Shakespearean characters. Asteroids can be named after anybody or anything at the discretion of their discoverers, subject to approval by the IAU's nomenclature panel.

Accepted planets

Asteroid According to the authority of the IAU, there are nine planets in our solar system. In increasing distance from the Sun they are: #Mercury (astronomical symbol ) #Venus () #Earth () with one confirmed natural satellite, Luna (the Moon) #Mars () with two confirmed natural satellites, Deimos and Phobos #Jupiter () with sixty-three confirmed natural satellites #Saturn () with forty-six confirmed natural satellites #Uranus (Uranus) with twenty-seven confirmed natural satellites #Neptune () with thirteen confirmed natural satellites #Pluto () with three confirmed natural satellites (Charon, S/2005 P 1, S/2005 P 2) However, there is some pressure for Pluto to be reclassified as a Kuiper Belt object, especially in light of the discovery of . This object, however, has not yet received a definitive classification from the IAU.

Other candidates

When Ceres was found orbiting between Mars and Jupiter in 1801, it was initially touted as a planet, but after many smaller objects were found with a similar orbit, it was classified as an asteroid. However, due to its large size (relative to the other asteroids), and its roughly spherical shape, Ceres would be considered a planet by some astronomers' definitions. Similarly, since 1992 many objects have been found in the predicted Kuiper Belt that exists beyond Neptune. Several of the largest of these have challenged the planetary status quo, as they are both spherical and larger than the bodies in the Mars-Jupiter asteroid belt, and are similar in size, orbit and composition to Pluto. However, as yet none have been accepted as planets by the IAU. The most significant of these are (in order of increasing distance from the Sun) 90482 Orcus, , 50000 Quaoar, , , 28978 Ixion, 20000 Varuna, 19521 Chaos, and 90377 Sedna. (However, it should be noted that Sedna is often considered to be beyond the Kuiper Belt; being either a member of the scattered disc or the inner Oort Cloud). Like Ceres before it, Sedna was widely touted as a planet when it was discovered in 2003, as it was the largest object found since Pluto. However, mainly due to its size still being smaller than Pluto's, it did not achieve planetary status from the IAU. However, the discovery in 2005 of (nicknamed Xena), with a size and mass larger than Pluto seems to have forced the issue. As of September 2005 it has not yet been accepted as a planet, but the IAU is expected to announce a definition of a planet by the end of the year, which will either see become a planet, or have Pluto stripped of its status.

Extrasolar planets

:Main article: Extrasolar planet. Of the 173 extrasolar planets (those outside our solar system) discovered to date (October 2005) most have masses which are about the same or larger than Jupiter's. Exceptions include a number of planets discovered orbiting burned-out star remnants called pulsars, such as PSR B1257+12, the planets orbiting the stars Mu Arae, 55 Cancri and GJ 436 which are approximately Neptune-sized [http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-22-04_pf.html], and a planet orbiting Gliese 876 that is estimated to be about 6 to 8 times as massive as the Earth and is probably rocky in origin. It is far from clear if the newly discovered large planets would resemble the gas giants in our solar system or if they are of an entirely different type as yet unknown, like ammonia giants or carbon planets. In particular, some of the newly discovered planets, known as hot Jupiters, orbit extremely close to their parent stars, in nearly circular orbits. They therefore receive much more stellar radiation than the gas giants in our solar system, which makes it questionable whether they are the same type of planet at all. There is also a class of hot Jupiters that orbit so close to their star that their atmospheres are slowly blown away in a comet-like tail: the Chthonian planets. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States has a program underway to develop a Terrestrial Planet Finder artificial satellite, which would be capable of detecting the planets with masses comparable to terrestrial planets. The frequency of occurrence of these planets is one of the variables in the Drake equation which estimates the number of intelligent, communicating civilizations that exist in our galaxy. Astronomers have recently [http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050711/full/050711-6.html] [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2005-115] detected a planet in a triple star system, a finding that challenges current theories of planetary formation. The planet, a gas giant slightly larger than Jupiter, orbits the main star of the HD 188753 system, in the constellation Cygnus, and is hence known as HD 188753 Ab. The stellar trio (yellow, orange, and red) is about 149 light-years from Earth. The planet, which is at least 14% larger than Jupiter, orbits the main star (HD 188753 A) once every 80 hours or so (3.3 days), at a distance of about 8 Gm, a twentieth of the distance between Earth and the Sun. The other two stars whirl tightly around each other in 156 days, and circle the main star every 25.7 years at a distance from the main star that would put them between Saturn and Uranus in our own Solar System. The latter stars invalidate the leading hot Jupiter formation theory, which holds these planets form at "normal" distances and then migrate inward through some debatable mechanism. This could not have occurred here, the outer star pair disrupting outer planet formation.

Brown dwarf "planets"

The discovery of a planet-sized satellite of a brown dwarf has blurred the distinction between "planet" and "moon." A brown dwarf, though a star in theory, in practice is often described as in between a planet and a star. It is formally defined by the IAU by its official statement that "Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed nor where they are located." To the IAU, the question of whether an object in orbit around a brown dwarf is a "planet" or a "moon" was simply not relevant, as it does not use the term "moon," only "satellite" and as yet has no official definition for "planet."

Interstellar planets

Interstellar planets are rogues in interstellar space, not gravitationally linked to any given solar system. No interstellar planet is known to date, but their existence is considered a likely hypothesis based on computer simulations of the origin and evolution of planetary systems, which often include the ejection of bodies of significant mass. Such objects are not formally called planets, however, since the IAU has not defined the term "planet".

Definition and classification of planets

Much like "continent", "planet" is a word without a precise definition, with history and culture playing as much of a role as geology and astrophysics. Recent definitions have been vague and imprecise; The American Heritage Dictionary, for instance, formerly defined a planet as: :A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asteroid or comet, illuminated by light from a star, such as the sun, around which it revolves. In the solar system there are nine known planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto.' However, for some time that definition has been viewed by many as inadequate. The eight largest planets (which are also the eight nearest to the Sun) are universally recognised as such, and for this reason are often universally referred to as "major planets", but there is controversy over Pluto and other smaller objects.

Suggested wide definitions

Since the discoveries of many of the objects in the Kuiper belt and around other stars, there has been a concerted push amongst scientists to come up with a precise definition of what constitutes a planet. In 1999, the IAU set up a working group to develop a scientifically plausible recommendation, but as of August, 2005 they had not reached a conclusion. After the discovery of (informally called "Xena"), a member of the committee, Alan Stern, has said that the group wanted "to get something done, pronto". He also informed journalists that a "consensus" in the group was moving towards the following definition: :
A planet is a body that directly orbits a star, is large enough to be round because of self gravity, and is not so large that it triggers nuclear fusion in its interior. Note that this definition also covers disputes at the upper end of a planet's size, which provides the extra benefit of forming a barrier between planets and brown dwarfs. Many consider this definition the best option as it sets up divisions based on physical characteristics rather than an arbitrary size limit. It is also somewhat universal in its application where other definitions have been crafted mainly to sort our own solar system into simple categories (such as placing the size limit as just under Mars, Mercury or Pluto). Depending how it is interpreted, objects counted as planets under such a new system would include some or all of the objects listed above, with potentially many more yet to be found. Gibor Basri, head of astronomy at the University of Berkeley, has suggested a similar definition and has also proposed the terms "fusor" (any object that achieves fusion in its core) and "planemo" (an object that is round from self-gravity but not a fusor) to help improve the astronomical nomenclature. Under Basri's definition: :A planet is a planemo orbiting a fusor These definitions have the advantage of creating a group including larger moons (which share many characteristics with the smaller planets) and also covering large free-roaming objects, which some astronomers think should be included in the definition of a planet. Basri has also suggested 'liberal use of adjectives' such as "major", "beltway", "dwarf", "giant", "super" and "historical".[http://astron.berkeley.edu/%7Ebasri/defineplanet/Mercury.htm] Others have suggested categories of planet/planemo based on composition such as "rock" (composed mainly of silicate), "gas" (composed mainly of hydrogen and helium), and "ice" (composed mainly of oxygen and carbon).

Suggested narrow definitions

There are alternate suggestions which would instead
reduce the number of planets in the system. Upon his discovery of Sedna, Mike Brown of Caltech suggested a definition which would exclude both Sedna and Pluto from being classified as planets, proposing the following: :A planet is any body in the solar system that is more massive than the total mass of all of the other bodies in a similar orbit [http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/sedna/#What%20is%20the%20definition%20of%20a%20planet?] This definition generally plays down the importance of size, but instead focuses on the formation of the proposed planet. Under this definition, no Kuiper Belt objects (including Pluto) would be considered planets. Brown's wish to "demote" Pluto prompted many to criticize him for setting out to create a purely scientific definition for a term which had an existing popular (albeit 'flawed') application. Upon his discovery of , Brown indicated he had become a convert to this way of thinking, and proposed that whatever definition of planet be adopted, it should include both Pluto and any Kuiper Belt object found to be larger than Pluto. [http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/planetlila/index.html]

Further classification

Astronomers distinguish between minor planets, such as asteroids, comets, and trans-Neptunian objects; and major (or true) planets. Planets within Earth's solar system can be divided into categories according to composition.
- Terrestrial or rocky: Planets that are similar to Earth — with bodies largely composed of rock: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars
- Jovian or gas giant: Those with a composition largely made up of gaseous material: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. Uranian planets, or ice giants, are a sub-class of gas giants, distinguished from true Jovians by their depletion in hydrogen and helium and a significant composition of rock and ice.
- Icy: Sometimes a third category is added to include bodies like Pluto, whose composition is primarily ice; this category of "icy" bodies also includes many non-planetary bodies such as the icy moons of the outer planets of our solar system (e.g. Triton). Many consider the Earth and its Moon to be a double planet, for several reasons:
- The Moon, as measured by its diameter, is 1.5 times larger than Pluto.
- The gravitational force of the Sun on the Moon is larger than the gravitational force of the Earth on the Moon by a factor of approx. 2.2. (This is not a unique situation in the solar system. The Sun's gravity is also stronger than the primary's on Jupiter's moon S/2003 J 2; Uranus' moon S/2001 U 2; Neptune's moons S/2002 N 4 and Psamathe; and several asteroid moons. However, Luna is the sole case of this phenomenon affecting an object of planetary mass.)

See also


- Definition of planet
- Planetary habitability
- Planetary science
- Planemo
- Planetoid
- Brown Dwarf
- Planets in science fiction
- Prograde and retrograde motion
- Skies of other planets

References


-
-
-
-
-

External links


- [http://www.nineplanets.org/ NinePlanets.org] - tour of the solar system
- [http://www.iau.org International Astronomical Union]
- [http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/uncgi/Solar/ Solar System Live] (an interactive orrery)
- [http://janus.astro.umd.edu/javadir/orbits/ssv.html Solar System Viewer] (animation)
- [http://www.sky-pics.net/ Pictures of the solar system]
- [http://gw.marketingden.com/planets/sun.html Renderings of the planets]
- [http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/ NASA Planet Quest]
- [http://www.ciw.edu/IAU/div3/wgesp/definition.html Working definition of "planet"] from IAU WGESP — the lower bound remained a matter of consensus in February 2003
- Dan Green's page on [http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ps/icq/ICQPluto.html planet classification]
- [http://www.spacedaily.com/news/outerplanets-04b.html Gravity Rules: The Nature and Meaning of Planethood]; S. Alan Stern; March 22, 2004
- [http://www.iau.org/IAU/FAQ/PlutoPR.html On the status of Pluto]; IAU, February 3, 1999
-
als:Planet ko:행성 ms:Planet ja:惑星 simple:Planet th:ดาวเคราะห์ zh-min-nan:He̍k-chheⁿ




World population

The world population is the total number of humans alive on the planet Earth at a given time. According to estimates published by the United States Census Bureau, the world population in June 2005 was ~6,450,000,000. In line with population projections, this figure continues to grow at rates that are unprecedented prior to the 20th century. Approximately one fifth of all humans in the last six thousand years are currently alive. By some estimates, there are now one billion (thousand million) young people in the world between the ages of 15 and 24.

When was six billion reached?

The United Nations Population Fund designated October 12, 1999 as the approximate day on which world population reached six billion. This was about 12 years after world population reached five billion, in 1987. The child that has been proclaimed by the United Nations Population Fund and welcomed by the U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan as the six billionth baby, was born on the designated day two minutes after midnight, not in India or China, as might be expected, but to Fatima Nevic and her husband Jasminko in Sarajevo, Bosnia.

Rate of population increase

Bosnia The last 70 years of the 20th century saw the biggest increase in the world's population in human history. The following table shows when each billion milestone was met:
- 1 billion reached in 1802.
- 2 billion reached in 1927.
- 3 billion reached in 1961.
- 4 billion reached in 1974.
- 5 billion reached in 1987.
- 6 billion reached in 1999. From the figures above, the world's population has tripled in 72 years, and doubled in 38 years up to the year of 1999. 1999 Including a few more estimates (beginning with 250 million around AD 950 and ending with 8 billion in 2027), the world population was doubled by the following years (doubling times in parentheses):
- AD 950 (650) 1600 (202) 1802 (125) 1927 (47) 1974 (50) 2027, or (beginning with 375 million around year 1420):
- 1420 (300) 1720 (155) 1875 (86) 1961 (38) 1999. Note how, until recently, each doubling has taken roughly half as long as the previous doubling. The UN estimated in 2000 that the world's population was then growing at the rate of 1.2 percent (or 77 million people) per year. This represents a decrease in the growth rate from its level in 1990, mostly due to decreasing birth rates. As of 2004, the world's population is increasing at a rate of 75 million people per year.

Forecast of world population

The future growth of population is difficult to predict. Birth rates are declining slightly on average, but vary greatly between developed countries (where birth rates are often at or below replacement levels) and developing countries. Death rates can change unexpectedly due to disease, wars and catastrophes, or advances in medicine. The UN itself has issued multiple projections of future world population, based on different assumptions. Over the last 10 years, the UN has consistently revised its world population projections downward. Current projections by the UN's Population Division, based on the 2004 revision of the World Population Prospects database , are as follows. Other projections of population growth predict that the world's population will eventually crest, though it is uncertain exactly when or how. In some scenarios, the population will crest as early as the mid-21st century at under 10 billion, due to gradually decreasing birth rates. In less optimistic scenarios, disasters triggered by the growing population's demand for scarce resources will eventually lead to a sudden population crash, or even a Malthusian catastrophe (also see overpopulation).

Doomsayers

In 1798, Thomas Malthus predicted that population growth would eventually outrun food supply, resulting in catastrophe. In 1968 Paul R. Ehrlich reignited this argument with his book The Population Bomb, which helped give the issue significant mindshare throughout the 1960s and 1970s. The dire predictions of Ehrlich and other neo-Malthusians were vigourously challenged by a number of economists, notably Julian Simon. On the opposite end of the spectrum there are a number of [http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=doomsayer&x=14&y=14 doomsayers] who argue that today's low fertility rates will have severe negative consequences: The Death of the West : How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization (ISBN 0312302592), by Patrick Buchanan, The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity (ISBN 0465050506), by Longman, and Fewer: How the New Demography of Depopulation Will Shape Our Future (ISBN 156663606X), by Wattenberg. Child poverty has been linked to people having children before they have the means to care for them. More recently, some scholars have put forward the Doomsday argument applying Bayesian probability to world population to argue that the end of humanity will come sooner than we usually think (toxic waste rather than food shortages).

Different continents

Bayesian probability The vertical axis of the chart above is in thousands. Likewise, the population figures in the table below are in thousands.

References

# http://www.census.gov/ # http://esa.un.org/unpp/

External links


- [http://esa.un.org/unpp/ World Population Prospects]. Retrieved April 7, 2005.
- [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3108_worldbal.html The World in Balance] Transcript of two-part PBS' Nova on World Population
- BBC (1999). [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/472704.stm UN chief welcomes six billionth baby]. Retrieved March 6, 2005.
- Central Intelligence Agency (2004). [http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/xx.html CIA The World Factbook 2004]. Retrieved February 13, 2005.
- United Nations (2001). [http://www.un.org/popin/ United Nations Population Information Network]. Retrieved February 13, 2005.
- United States Census Bureau (2004). [http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/worldhis.html Historical Estimates of World Population]. Retrieved February 13, 2005.
- PopulationData.net (2005). [http://www.populationdata.net PopulationData.net - Informations and maps about populations around the world].
- Population Reference Bureau [http://www.prb.org www.prb.org - News and issues related to population].
- World Population Clock (2005). [http://www.worldpopclock.com WorldPopClock.com - World population clock].
- Population Counter. [http://rumkin.com/tools/population/ See estimates of populations in various countries around the world and watch them get updated! China is the most active, so if you want to see what happens, just go straight to that densely populated country.]. Category:Population ko:세계 인구 ja:世界人口

Natural satellite

The common noun moon (not capitalized) is used to mean any natural satellite of the other planets. There are at least 140 moons within Earth's solar system, and presumably many others orbiting the planets of other stars. The large gas giants have extensive systems of moons, including half a dozen comparable in size to Earth's moon. Mercury and Venus have no moons at all, Earth has one large moon ("The Moon"), Mars has two tiny moons, and Pluto has three, including a large companion called Charon (Pluto and Charon are sometimes considered a double planet).

Origin

Most moons are assumed to have been formed out of the same collapsing region of protoplanetary disk that gave rise to its primary. However, there are many exceptions and variations to this standard model of moon formation that are known or theorized. Several moons are thought to be captured asteroids; others may be fragments of larger moons shattered by impacts, or (in the case of Earth's Moon) a portion of the planet itself blasted into orbit by a large impact. As most moons are known only through a few observations via probes or telescopes, most theories about their origins are still uncertain.

Orbital characteristics

Most moons in the solar system are tidally locked to their primaries, meaning that one side of the moon is always turned toward the planet. Exceptions are Saturn's moon Hyperion, which rotates chaotically due to a variety of external influences, and the outermost moons of the gas giants, which are too far away to become 'locked' (an example is Saturn's moon Phoebe). It is not possible for a moon to have moons of its own: the tidal effects of their primaries would make such a system unstable. However, several moons have small companions in the Lagrangian points of their orbits (e.g., Saturn's moons Tethys and Dione). The recent discovery of 243 Ida's moon Dactyl confirms that some asteroids also have moons. Some, like 90 Antiope, are double asteroids with two equal-sized components. The asteroid 87 Sylvia has two moons. See asteroid moon for further information.

Moons of the Solar system

The largest moons in the solar system (those bigger than about 3000 km across) are Earth's Moon, Jupiter's Galilean moons Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, Saturn's moon Titan, and Neptune's captured moon Triton. For smaller moons see the articles on the appropriate planet. The following is a comparative table classifying the moons of the solar system by diameter. The column on the right includes some notable planets, asteroids and Kuiper belt objects for comparison.
Diameter(km) Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto Other objects
5000-6000

Ganymede Titan



4000-5000

Callisto



Mercury
3000-4000 Luna
Io
Europa





2000-3000




Triton

Pluto
1000-2000



Rhea
Iapetus
Dione
Tethys
Titania
Oberon
Umbriel
Ariel


Charon
90377 Sedna
90482 Orcus
50000 Quaoar
20000 Varuna
28978 Ixion
100-1000

Himalia
Amalthea
Enceladus Mimas
Hyperion
Phoebe
Janus
Epimetheus
Prometheus
Miranda
Sycorax
Puck
Portia
Proteus
Nereid
Larissa
Galatea
Despina
S/2005 P 12
S/2005 P 22
1 Ceres
2 Pallas
4 Vesta
10 Hygiea
511 Davida
704 Interamnia
3 Juno
(and many others)
50-100

Thebe
Elara
Pasiphaë
Pandora Caliban
Juliet
Belinda
Cressida
Rosalind
Desdemona
Bianca
Thalassa
Naiad
S/2002 N 4

(Too many to list)
10-50
Phobos
Deimos
Carme
Metis
Sinope
Lysithea
Ananke
Leda
Adrastea
Siarnaq Atlas
Helene
Albiorix
Telesto
Pan
Paaliaq
Calypso
Ymir
Kiviuq
Tarvos
Ijiraq
Ophelia Cordelia
Setebos
Prospero
Stephano
Perdita
S/2001 U 2
S/2001 U 3
Margaret
Trinculo
Mab
Cupid
S/2002 N 1
S/2002 N 2
S/2002 N 3
Psamathe

(Too many to list)
less than 10 Cruithne1
At least 47,
see Jupiter's natural satellites
for a listing.
Erriapo
Narvi
Skathi
Mundilfari
Suttungr
Thrymr
Pallene
Polydeuces
Methone
S/2004 S 3
Daphnis



(Too many to list)
1) Cruithne is not a real moon; it is mainly placed here for comparison's sake.
2) Diameters of the new Plutonian satellites are still very poorly known, but they are estimated to lie between 64 and 200 km.
In addition to the moons of the various planets there are also over 30 known asteroid moons, asteroids that orbit other asteroids.

See also


- Mars' natural satellites
- Jupiter's natural satellites
- Saturn's natural satellites
- Uranus' natural satellites
- Neptune's natural satellites
- Pluto's natural satellites
- Timeline of natural satellites
- Naming of natural satellites
- Quasi-satellite

External links

Jupiter's moons


- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~sheppard/satellites/jupsatdata.html Data on Jupiter's satellites]
- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/jmoons/jmoons.html Jupiter's new moons (discovered in 2000)]
- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~sheppard/satellites/jup.html Jupiter's new moons (discovered in 2002)]
- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~sheppard/satellites/jup2003.html Jupiter's new moons (discovered in 2003)]

Saturn's moons


- [http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Oct00/Saturn.moons.deb.html Saturn's new moons (discovered in 2000)]
- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~sheppard/satellites/sat2003.html Saturn's new moon (discovered in 2003)]

Neptune's moons


- [http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/whatsnew/pr/030113A.html Neptune's new moons (discovered in 2003)]

All moons


- [http://www.planetary.org/learn/solarsystem/moons.html Moons of the Solar System (The Planetary Society)]
- [http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~sheppard/satellites Scott Sheppard's page]
- [http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov JPL's Solar System Dynamics page]
- [http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planet_photo_040910.html Moon of an Object? First Photo of Satellite Beyond the Solar System]
- [http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/append7.html USGS list of named moons] ----
-
als:Satellit (Astronomie) ko:위성 ms:Satelit semulajadi ja:衛星 th:ดาวบริวาร

Mars/Planet

Mars, the fourth planet from the Sun in our solar system, is named after the Roman god of war Mars (Ares in Greek mythology), because of its apparent red color. This feature also earned it the nickname "The Red Planet". Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos, which are small and oddly-shaped, possibly being captured asteroids. The prefix areo- refers to Mars in the same way geo- refers to Earth—for example, areology versus geology. (However, areology is also used to refer to the study of Mars as a whole rather than just the geological processes of the planet.) The astronomical symbol for Mars is a circle with an arrow pointing northeast (Unicode: ♂). This symbol is a stylized representation of the shield and spear of the god Mars, and in biology it is used as a sign for the male sex. The Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese cultures refer to the planet as the fire star, 火星, a naming based on the ancient Chinese mythological cycle of Five Elements.

Mythology

Mars has been obvious to skygazers since prehistoric times. It was known by the Egyptians as "Her Deschel" or "the Red One." Among the Babylonians Mars was known as "Nergal" or "the Star of Death." The Romans were the ones to give Mars its modern name, after their god of war.

Physical characteristics

The red, fiery appearance of Mars is caused by iron oxide (rust) on its surface. Mars has only a quarter the surface area of the Earth and only one-tenth the mass, though its surface area is approximately equal to that of the Earth's dry land because Mars lacks oceans. The solar day (or sol) on Mars is very close to Earth's day: 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35.244 seconds.

Atmosphere

Mars' atmosphere is thin: the air pressure on the surface is only 750 pascals, about 0.75% of the average on Earth. However, the scale height of the atmosphere is about 11 km, somewhat higher than Earth's 6 km. The atmosphere on Mars is 95% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen, 1.6% argon, and contains traces of oxygen and water. The atmosphere quite dusty, giving the Martian sky a tawny color when seen from the surface; data from the Mars Exploration Rovers indicates the suspended dust particles are roughly 1.5 microns across. In 2003, methane was apparently discovered in the atmosphere by Earth-based telescopes and possibly confirmed in March 2004 by the Mars Express Orbiter; present measurements state an average methane concentration of about 11±4 ppb by volume (see reference). The thin atmosphere cannot hold heat and is the cause of the lower temperatures on Mars. The maximum temperature is roughly 20℃ (68℉). The presence of methane on Mars would be very intriguing, since as an unstable gas it indicates that there must be (or have been within the last few hundred years) a source of the gas on the planet. Volcanic activity, comet impacts, and the existence of life in the form of microorganisms such as methanogens are among possible but as yet unproven sources. The methane appears to occur in patches, which suggests that it is being rapidly broken down before it has time to become uniformly distributed in the atmosphere, and so it is presumably also continually being released to the atmosphere. Plans are now being made to look for other companion gases that may suggest which sources are most likely; in the Earth's oceans biological methane production tends to be accompanied by ethane, while volcanic methane is accompanied by sulfur dioxide. Other aspects of the Martian atmosphere vary significantly. In the winter months when the poles are in continual darkness, the surface gets so cold that as much as 25% of the entire atmosphere condenses out into meters thick slabs of CO2 ice (dry ice). When the poles are again exposed to sunlight the CO2 ice sublimates, creating enormous winds that sweep off the poles as fast as 250 mph. These seasonal actions transport large amounts of dust and water vapor giving rise to Earth-like frost and large cirrus clouds. These clouds of water-ice were photographed by the Opportunity rover in 2004.[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20041213a/merb_sol290_clouds-B313R1_br.jpg] Recently, evidence has been discovered suggesting that Mars may be warming in the short term[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4266474.stm]; however, it is now cooler than it was in the 1970s.[http://catdynamics.blogspot.com/2005/09/climate-science-mars-and-politics.html]

Geology

Opportunity The surface of Mars is thought to be primarily composed of basalt, based upon the Martian meteorite collection and orbital observations. There is some evidence that some portion of the Martian surface might be more silica-rich than typical basalt, perhaps similar to andesitic rocks on Earth, though these observations may also be explained by silica glass. Much of the surface is deeply covered by dust as fine as talcum powder. Observations of the magnetic fields on Mars by the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft have revealed that parts of the planet's crust has been magnetized. This magnetization has been compared to alternating bands found on the ocean floors of Earth. One interesting theory, published in 1999 and reexamined in October 2005 in a publication by the same group, is that these bands could be evidence of the past operation of plate tectonics on Mars. However, this has yet to be proven [http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA02008] or widely accepted and remains an area of active research. plate tectonics Amongst the findings from the Opportunity rover is the presence of hematite on Mars in the form of small spheres on the Meridiani Planum. The spheres are only a few millimeters in diameter and are believed to have formed as rock deposits under watery conditions billions of years ago. Other minerals have also been found containing forms of sulfur, iron or bromine such as jarosite. This and other evidence led a group of 50 scientists to conclude in the December 9, 2004 edition of the journal Science that "Liquid water was once intermittently present at the Martian surface at Meridiani, and at times it saturated the subsurface. Because liquid water is a key prerequisite for life, we infer conditions at Meridiani may have been habitable for some period of time in Martian history". On the opposite side of the planet the mineral goethite, which (unlike hematite) forms only in the presence of water, along with other evidence of water, has also been found by the Spirit rover in the "Columbia Hills". In 1996, researchers studying a meteorite (ALH84001) believed to have originated from Mars reported features which they attributed to microfossils left by life on Mars. As of 2005, this interpretation remains controversial with no consensus having emerged.

Topography

As of 2005 As of 2005 The dichotomy of Martian topography is striking: northern plains flattened by lava flows contrast with the southern highlands, pitted and cratered by ancient impacts. The surface of Mars as seen from Earth is consequently divided into two kinds of areas, with differing albedo. The paler plains covered with dust and sand rich in reddish iron oxides were once thought of as Martian 'continents' and given names like Arabia Terra (
land of Arabia) or Amazonis Planitia (Amazonian plain). The dark features were thought to be seas, hence their names Mare Erythraeum, Mare Sirenum and Aurorae Sinus. The largest dark feature seen from Earth is Syrtis Major. Syrtis Major Mars has polar ice caps that contain frozen water and carbon dioxide that change with the Martian seasons — the carbon dioxide ice sublimates in summer it uncovers an underlying surface of layered water ice and dust. The polar carbon dioxide "hood" then forms again in winter. The supposedly-extinct shield volcano, Olympus Mons (Mount Olympus), is at 26 km the highest mountain in the solar system. It is in a vast upland region called Tharsis, which contains several large volcanos. See list of mountains on Mars. Mars also has the solar system's largest canyon system, Valles Marineris or the Mariner Valley, which is 4000 km long and 7 km deep. Mars is also scarred by a number of impact craters. The largest of these is the Hellas impact basin, covered with light red sand. See list of craters on Mars. The difference between Mars' highest and lowest points is nearly 31 km (from the top of Olympus Mons at an altitude of 26 km to the bottom of the Hellas impact basin at an altitude of 4 km below the datum). In comparison, the difference between Earth's highest and lowest points (Mount Everest and the Mariana Trench) is only 19.7 km. Combined with the planets' different radii, this means Mars is nearly three times "rougher" than Earth. The International Astronomical Union's Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature is responsible for naming Martian surface features. Other notes: Zero elevation: Since Mars has no oceans and hence no 'sea level', a zero-elevation surface or mean gravity surface must be selected. The datum for Mars is defined by the fourth-degree and fourth-order spherical harmonic gravity field, with the zero altitude defined by the 610.5 Pa (6.105 mbar) atmospheric pressure surface (approximately 0.6% of Earth's) at a temperature of 273.16 K. This pressure and temperature correspond to the triple point of water. Zero meridian: Mars' equator is defined by its rotation, but the location of its Prime Meridian was specified, as was Earth's, by choice of an arbitrary point which was accepted by later observers. The German astronomers Wilhelm Beer and Johann Heinrich Mädler selected a small circular feature as a reference point when they produced the first systematic chart of Mars features in 1830-32. In 1877, their choice was adopted as the prime meridian by the Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli when he began work on his notable maps of Mars. After the spacecraft Mariner 9 provided extensive imagery of Mars in 1972, a small crater (later called Airy-0), located in the Sinus Meridiani ('Middle Bay' or 'Meridian Bay') along the line of Beer and Mädler, was chosen by Merton Davies of the RAND Corporation to provide a more precise definition of 0.0° longitude when he established a planetographic control point network. RAND Corporation

Canals

Mars has an important place in human imagination due to the belief by some that life existed on Mars. These beliefs are due mainly to observations by many in the 19th century popularized by Percival Lowell and Giovanni Schiaparelli. Schiaparelli called these observed features
canali, meaning channels in Italian. This was popularly mistranslated as 'canals', and the myth of the Martian canals began. They were apparently artificial linear features on the surface that were asserted to be canals, and due to seasonal changes in the brightness of some areas that were thought to be caused by vegetation growth. This gave rise to many stories concerning Martians. The linear features are now known to be mostly non-existent or, in some cases, dry ancient watercourses. The color changes have been ascribed to dust storms.

Ice lakes

many stories On 29 July 2005, the BBC reported that a visible ice lake had been discovered in a crater in the north polar region of Mars[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4727847.stm]. Images of the crater, taken by the High Resolution Stereo Camera on board the European Space Agency's Mars Express spacecraft, clearly show a broad sheet of ice in the bottom of an unnamed crater located on Vastitas Borealis, a broad plain that covers much of Mars' far northern latitudes, at approximately 70.5° North and 103° East. The crater is 35 km (23 mi) wide and about 2 km (1.2 mi) deep. The BBC report however, appears to have either intentionally sensationalized or unintentionally mis-interpreted the original HRSC/Mars Express feature[http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars_Express/SEMGKA808BE_0.html], which makes no claim or insinuation that this is a "lake". Like many thousands of other places on Mars, this ice sheet is a thin layer of frost that has condensed onto dark, cold sand dunes (about 200 m high) making their way across the bottom of the crater. The only thing remarkable about this feature is that it is far enough north to maintain at least some frost throughout the year.

The moons of Mars

Mars has two tiny natural moons, Phobos and Deimos, which orbit very close to the planet and are thought to be captured asteroids.

The exploration of Mars

asteroid Dozens of spacecraft, including orbiters, landers, and rovers, have been sent to Mars by the Soviet Union, the United States, Europe, and Japan to study the planet's surface, climate, and geography. Roughly two-thirds of all spacecraft destined for Mars have failed in one manner or another before completing or even beginning their missions. Part of this high failure rate can be ascribed to technical problems, but enough have either failed or lost communications for no apparent reason that some researchers half-jokingly speak of an Earth-Mars "Bermuda Triangle" or of a Great Galactic Ghoul which subsists on a diet of Mars probes, or of a Mars Curse. Among the most successful missions are the Mars probe program, the Mariner and Viking programs, Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Pathfinder, and Mars Odyssey. Global Surveyor has taken pictures of gullies and debris flow features that suggest there may be current sources of liquid water, similar to an aquifer, at or near the surface of the planet. Another possible origin proposed for these gully features is transient melting of surface water snow, frost, or ice. Mars Odyssey determined that there are significant deposits of water ice in the upper meter or so of Mars' regolith within 30° of the north and south pole. In 2003, the ESA launched the Mars Express craft consisting of the Mars Express Orbiter and the lander Beagle 2. Attempts to contact the Beagle 2 failed and it was declared lost in early February 2004. Beagle 2 Also in 2003, NASA launched the twin Mars Exploration Rovers named
Spirit (MER-A) and Opportunity (MER-B). Both missions landed successfully in January 2004 and have met or exceeded all their targets; while a 90-day nominal mission was planned, as of February 2005, their missions have been extended twice and they continue to return science, although some mechanical faults have occurred. Among the most significant science return has been evidence of liquid water some time in the past at both landing sites. In addition, dust devils imaged from ground-level have been detected moving across the surface of Mars by Spirit (MER-A). (See picture below). Dust devils were first imaged on Mars from the surface by Mars Pathfinder. Mars Pathfinder

Nomenclature

Early nomenclature

Although better remembered for mapping the Moon starting in 1830, Johann Heinrich Mädler and Wilhelm Beer were the first "areographers". They started off by establishing once and for all that most of the surface features were permanent, and pinned down Mars' rotation period. In 1840, Mädler combined ten years of observations and drew the first map of Mars ever made. Rather than giving names to the various markings they mapped, Beer and Mädler simply designated them with letters; Meridian Bay (Sinus Meridiani) was thus feature "a". Over the next twenty years or so, as instruments improved and the number of observers also increased, various Martian features acquired a hodge-podge of names. To give a couple of examples, Solis Lacus was known as the "Oculus" (the Eye), and Syrtis Major was usually known as the "Hourglass Sea" or the "Scorpion". In 1858, it was also dubbed the "Atlantic Canale" by the Jesuit astronomer Angelo Secchi. Secchi commented that it "seems to play the role of the Atlantic which, on Earth, separates the Old Continent from the New" —this was the first time the fateful
canale, which in Italian can mean either "channel" or "canal", had been applied to Mars. In 1867, Richard Anthony Proctor drew up a map of Mars based, somewhat crudely, on the Rev. William Rutter Dawes' earlier drawings of 1865, then the best ones available. Proctor explained his system of nomenclature by saying, "I have applied to the different features the names of those observers who have studied the physical peculiarities presented by Mars." Here are some of his names, paired with those later proposed by Schiaparelli:
- Kaiser Sea = Syrtis Major1865
- Lockyer Land = Hellas
- Main Sea = Lacus Moeris
- Herschel II Strait = Sinus Sabaeus
- Dawes Continent = Aeria and Arabia
- De La Rue Ocean = Mare Erythraeum
- Lockyer Sea = Solis Lacus
- Dawes Sea = Tithonius Lacus
- Madler Continent = Chryse, Ophir, Tharsis
- Maraldi Sea = Mares Sirenum and Cimmerium
- Secchi Continent = Memnonia
- Hooke Sea = Mare Tyrrhenum
- Cassini Land = Ausonia
- Herschel I Continent = Zephyria, Aeolis, Aethiopis
- Hind Land = Libya Proctor's nomenclature has often been criticized, mainly because so many of his names honored English astronomers, but also because he used many names more than once. In particular, Dawes appeared no fewer than
six times (Dawes Ocean, Dawes Continent, Dawes Sea, Dawes Strait, Dawes Isle, and Dawes Forked Bay). Even so, Proctor's names are not without charm, and for all their shortcomings they were a foundation on which later astronomers would improve.

Modern nomenclature

Today, features on Mars derive from a number of sources. Large albedo features retain many of the older names, but are often updated to reflect new knowledge of the nature of the features. For example 'Nix Olympica' (the snows of Olympus) has become 'Olympus Mons' (Mount Olympus). Large Martian craters are named after important scientists and science fiction writers; smaller ones are named after towns and villages on Earth.

Observation of Mars

Earth passes Mars every 780 days (or two years plus seven weeks and one day) at a distance of about 80,000,000 km. However, this varies because the orbits are elliptical. To a naked-eye observer, Mars usually shows a distinct yellow, orange or reddish colour, and varies in brightness more than any other planet as seen from Earth over the course of its orbit, due to the fact that when furthest away from the Earth it is more than seven times as far from the latter as when it is closest (and can be lost in the Sun's glare for months at a time when least favourably positioned). At its most favourable times — which occur twice every 32 years, alternately at 15 and 17-year intervals, and always between late July and late September — Mars shows a wealth of surface detail to a telescope. Especially noticeable, even at low magnification, are the polar ice caps. polar ice cap On August 27, 2003, at 9:51:13 UT, Mars made its closest approach to Earth in nearly 60,000 years: 55,758,006 km (approximately 35 million miles) without Light-time correction. This close approach came about because Mars was one day from opposition and about three days from its perihelion, making Mars particularly easy to see from Earth. The last time it came so close is estimated to have been on September 12, 57,617 BC. Detailed analysis of the solar system's gravitational landscape forecasts an even closer approach in 2287. However, to keep this in perspective, this record approach was only an imperceptibly tiny fraction less than other recent close approaches that occur four times every 284 years. For instance, the minimum distance on August 22 1924 was 0.37284 AU, compared to 0.37271 AU on August 27 2003, and the minimum distance on August 24 2208 will be 0.37278 AU. A transit of the Earth as seen from Mars will occur on November 10, 2084. At that time the Sun, the Earth and Mars will be exactly in a line. There are also transits of Mercury and transits of Venus, and the moon Deimos is of sufficiently small angular diameter that its partial "eclipses" of the Sun are best considered transits (see Transit of Deimos from Mars). The only occultation of Mars by Venus to be observed was that of October 3, 1590, seen by M. Möstlin at Heidelberg. Heidelberg

Appearance


Martian meteorites

:
Main article: Martian meteorites A handful of objects are known that are surely meteorites and may be of Martian origin. Two of them may show signs of ancient bacterial activity. On August 6, 1996 NASA announced that analysis of the ALH 84001 meteorite thought to have come from Mars, shows some features that may be fossils of single-celled organisms, although this idea is controversial. In Solar System Research (March 2004, vol 38, page 97) it was suggested that the unique Kaidun meteorite, recovered from Yemen, may have originated on the Martian moon of Phobos. On April 14, 2004, NASA revealed that a rock known as "Bounce", studied by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity, was similar in composition to the meteorite EETA79001-B, discovered in Antarctica in 1979. The rock may have been ejected from the same crater as the meteorite, or from another crater in the same area of the Martian surface.

Life on Mars

Evidence exists that the planet once was significantly more habitable than today, but the question whether living organisms ever actually existed there is an open one. Some researchers think that a certain rock which is believed to have originated on Mars - specifically, meteorite ALH84001 - does contain evidence of past biologic activity, but no consensus about these claims has been achieved so far and recent research indicates that the rock, since its creation several billion years ago, has never been exposed to temperatures for extended periods of time that would allow for liquid water. The Viking probes carried experiments designed to detect microorganisms in Martian soil at their respective landing sites, and had some positive results, later denied by many scientists, resulting in ongoing controversy. Also, present biologic activity is one of the explanations that have been suggested for the presence of traces of methane within the Martian atmosphere, but other explanations not involving life are generally considered more likely. If colonization is going to happen, Mars seems a likely choice due to its rather hospitable conditions (compared with other planets, it is most like Earth).

The Mars flag

colonization In early 2000, a proposed Mars flag flew aboard the space shuttle Discovery. Designed by NASA engineer and Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station task force leader Pascal Lee and carried aboard by astronaut John Mace Grunsfeld, the flag consists of three vertical bars (red, green, and blue), symbolizing the transformation of Mars from a barren planet (red) to one bearing sustainable life (green), and finally to a fully terraformed planet with open bodies of water. This design was suggested by the Kim Stanley Robinson sci-fi trilogy
Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue Mars. While other designs have been proposed, the republican tricolor has been adopted by the Mars Society as its own official banner. In a statement released after the launch of the mission, the Society said that the flag "has now been honored by a vessel of the leading spacefaring nation on Earth," and added that "(i)t is fitting that this action occurred when it did: at the dawning of a new millenium."

Mars in fiction

The depiction of Mars in fiction has been stimulated its dramatic red color and by early scientific speculations that its surface conditions might be capable of supporting life. Until the arrival of planetary probes, the traditional view of Mars derived from the astronomers Percival Lowell and Giovanni Schiaparelli, whose observation of supposedly linear features on the planet created the myth of canals on Mars. For many years, a standard notion of the planet as a drying, cooling, dying world with ancient civilizations constructing irrigation works. Thus originated a large number of science fiction scenarios, the best known of which is H. G. Wells'
The War of the Worlds, in which Martians seek to escape their dying planet by invading Earth. After the Mariner and Viking spacecraft had returned pictures of Mars as it really is, an apparently lifeless and canal-less world, these ideas about Mars had to be abandoned and a vogue for accurate, realist depictions of human colonies on Mars developed, the best known of which may be Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy. However, pseudo-scientific speculations about the Face on Mars and other enigmatic landmarks spotted by space probes have meant that ancient civilizations continue to be a popular theme in science fiction, especially in film. Another popular theme, particularly among American writers, is the Martian colony that fights for independence from Earth. This is a major plot element in the novels of Greg Bear and Kim Stanley Robinson, as well as the movie Total Recall (based on a novel by Philip K. Dick) and the television series Babylon 5. Many video games also use this element, such as Red Faction.

See also


- Areography
- Astrobiology
- Astronomy on Mars
- Colonization of Mars
- Darian calendar
- Face on Mars photo article
- Timekeeping on Mars
- Exploration of Mars
- List of artificial objects on Mars
- List of craters on Mars
- List of mountains on Mars
- Martian meteorite
- Mars photos
- Mars in fiction
- Extraterrestrial life
- Terraforming
- Mars Direct
- Mars in astrology
- Ares
- Tyr
- Richard C. Hoagland

References


- William Sheehan, [http://www.uapress.arizona.edu/onlinebks/mars/contents.htm
The Planet Mars: A History of Observation and Discovery], The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1996
- Vladimir A. Krasnopolsky, Jean-Pierre Maillard, Tobias C. Owen,
[http://www.google.ca/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU04/06169/EGU04-A-06169.pdf&e=912 Detection of methane in the Martian atmosphere: evidence for life?], Icarus, 172 (2), 537-547. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2004Sci...306.1753L&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=439c7b95b425777 Lemmon et al., "Atmospheric Imaging Results from the Mars Exploration Rovers: Spirit and Opportunity"]

External links


- [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/marsfact.html NASA's Mars fact sheet]
- [http://www.nineplanets.org/mars.html Nine Planets Mars page]
- [http://www.marsnews.com MarsNews.com - News and info site]
- [http://www.student.oulu.fi/~jkorteni/space/mars/surface/ Introduction to Martian topography, with Hubble Space Telescope photos]
- [http://www.geoinf.fu-berlin.de/mex/ FU Berlin: HRSC (camera) experiment at Mars Express] (eng. & ger.; press releases and high resolution images)
- [http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/mars24/help/notes.html Technical Notes about Time on Mars]
- [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4212/on-mars.html On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet 1958-1978] from the NASA History Office.
- [http://flagspot.net/flags/mars.html The Mars Society flag]
- [http://www.vias.org/spacetrip/mars_globalview.html A Trip Into Space] Photos and descriptions of Mars
- [http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/980815paper.html Martian Law - a CATO white paper]
- [http://www.marsunearthed.com/ Mars Unearthed] - Comparisons of terrains between Earth and Mars
- [http://www.ibiblio.org//e-notes/VRML/Globe/Globe.htm 3D VRML Mars globe]
- [http://www.enterprisemission.com/ Enterprise Mission: Richard C. Hoagland's Homepage]

Water on Mars


- [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4727847.stm Highly visible ice lake found on Mars - BBC]
- Dr. Tony Phillips: [http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast29jun_1m.htm "Making a Splash on Mars"],
Science@NASA article, June 29, 2000. Phillips describes the Martian "gullies" and explains the conditions under which liquid water can exist on the surface of Mars.
- [http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_2009000/2009318.stm BBC News story on subsurface ice deposits on Mars]
- [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3426539.stm BBC News update on Mars Express' findings of polar water ice and water-eroded features on the surface]
- [http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/opportunity_water.html Mars Rover Scientists Wring Water Story from Rocks] This image taken by Mars Rover
Opportunity shows microscopic rock forms indicating past signs of water. Courtesy: NASA
- [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4285119.stm BBC News Mars pictures reveal frozen sea]

Mars exploration


- [http://www.transhumanist.com/volume4/space.htm The Political Economy of Very Large Space Projects (Journal Of Evolution and Technology)]
- [http://www.exploremarsnow.org/ exploreMarsnow] Interactive Mars base simulation. Winner of 2003 Webby Award for Science.
- [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html NASA Mars Exploration Rover Home Page]
- [http://dualmoments.com/marsrovers/index.html Be on Mars] Anaglyphs from the Mars Rovers (3D)
-
als:Mars (Planet) ko:화성 ms:Marikh ja:火星 simple:Mars (planet) th:ดาวอังคาร


Solar system

The solar system comprises our Sun and the retinue of celestial objects gravitationally bound to it. Traditionally, this is said to consist of the Sun, nine planets and their 158 currently known moons; however, a large number of other objects, including asteroids, meteoroids, planetoids, comets, and interplanetary dust, orbit the Sun as well. Although the term "solar system" is frequently applied to other star systems and the planetary systems which may comprise them, it should strictly refer to our system specifically: the word "solar" is derived from the Sun's Latin name, Sol (and the term sometimes appears as Solar System). When talking about another stellar system (or planetary system), including the star(s) and bodies associated with them through gravity, it is usual to shorten it to "the system" (e.g. "the Alpha Centauri system" or "the 51 Pegasi system").

Structure and layout of the solar system

The Sun (astronomical symbol ☉) is a main sequence G2 star that contains 99.86% of the system's known mass. Its two largest orbiting bodies, Jupiter and Saturn, account for 91% of the remainder (The Oort Cloud might hold a substantial percentage, but as yet its existence is unconfirmed). In broad terms, the charted regions of our solar system consist of the Sun and its planetary system: the eight bodies in relatively unique orbits (commonly called planets or major planets) and two belts of smaller objects (which can be called minor planets, planetoids, meteoroids, planetesimals or, in the case of Pluto, planets). Objects in orbit round the Sun all lie within the same shallow plane, called the ecliptic, and all orbit in the same direction. Many are in turn orbited by moons, and the largest are encircled by planetary rings of dust and other particles. The major planets are, in order, Mercury (☿), Venus (♀), Earth (♁), Mars (♂), Jupiter (♃), Saturn (♄), Uranus (♅/10px), Neptune (♆), and Pluto (♇), though Pluto's status has been thrown into question by the discovery of (see below). Eight of the nine planets are named after or derived from gods and goddesses from Greco-Roman mythology; Earth, a Germanic word, is known in many Romance languages as Terra, the Roman goddess of the Earth. Distances within the solar system are measured most often in astronomical units, or AU. 1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun, or 149 598 000 kilometers. Pluto is roughly 38 AU from the Sun, while Jupiter lies at roughly 5.2 AU. For very large distances within the solar system, such as regions beyond Pluto or the orbital circumferences of planets, the terameter (Tm, one milliard kilometers) is sometimes used. Despite the fact that many diagrams (like the image at the top of this article), for practicality's sake, represent the solar system as having each orbit the same distance apart, in actuality the orbits are largely arranged geometrically, that is, each is roughly double the distance from the Sun as the one before it. Venus’s distance from the Sun is roughly double that of Mercury, Earth’s distance is roughly double that of Venus, Mars’s double that of Earth and so on. This relationship is roughly expressed in the Titius-Bode law, a mathematical formula for predicting the semi-major axes of planets in AU. In its simplest form, it is written : a= 0.4 + 0.3\times k where k=0,1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128. By this formulation, we would expect Mercury's orbit (k=0) to be 0.4 AU, and Mars's orbit (k=4) to be at 1.6 AU. In fact their orbits are 0.38 and 1.52 AU.Ceres, the largest asteroid, lies at k=8. This law is only a rough guide, and doesn't fit all of the planets (Neptune is far closer than predicted, though Pluto lies at Neptune's predicted orbit). As of now, there is no scientific explanation for why this law "works," and many claim it is merely a coincidence. Pluto

Origin and evolution of the solar system

The current hypothesis of solar system formation is the nebular hypothesis, first proposed in 1755 by Immanuel Kant. It states the solar system was formed from a gaseous cloud called the solar nebula. It had a diameter of 100 AU and was 2-3 times the mass of the Sun. Over time, the nebula began to collapse, possiby due to disturbance by a nearby supernova. This explosion sent shock waves into space, which squeezed the nebula, pushing more and more matter inward until gravitational forces overcame its internal gas pressure and it also began to collapse. As the nebula collapsed, it decreased in size, which in turn caused it to spin faster to conserve angular momentum. And as the competing forces associated with gravity, gas pressure, magnetic fields, and rotation acted on it, the contracting nebula began to flatten into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center. When the nebula further condensed, a protostar was formed in the middle. This system was heated by the friction of the rocks colliding into each other. Lighter elements such as hydrogen and helium evaporated out of the centre and migrated to the edges of the disc, thus concentrating the heavier elements to form dust and rocks in the centre. These heavier elements clumped together to form planetesimals and protoplanets. In the outer regions of this solar nebula, ice and volatile gases were able to survive, and as a result, the inner planets are rocky and the outer planets were massive enough to capture large amounts of lighter gases, such as hydrogen and helium. After 100 million years, the pressures and densities of hydrogen in the centre of the collapsed nebula became great enough for the protosun to sustain thermonuclear fusion reactions. As a result of this, hydrogen was converted to helium, and a great amount of heat was released. 4×1H → 4He + neutrinos + photons During that time, the protostar turned into the Sun and the protoplanets and planetesimals were transformed into planets. All of the planets formed in a relatively short time of a few million years.

Regions of the solar system

protostar's rotating magnetic field on the plasma in the interplanetary medium (Solar Wind) [http://quake.stanford.edu/~wso/gifs/HCS.html]. (click to enlarge) ]] According to their location, the