:: wikimiki.org ::

Candidate

Candidate

A candidate is a person seeking or being considered for some kind of position; for example:
- to be elected to an office - In this case a candidate selection procedure occurs.
- to receive an honor or award
- to receive membership in a group See also:
- Soviet-related intermediate status, Kandidat

Election

An election is a decision making process whereby people vote for preferred political candidates or parties to act as representatives in government. This is the usual mechanism by which a democracy fills offices in the legislature, and sometimes in the executive and judiciary, and in regional and local government. This is also typically the case in a wide range of other private and business organizations, from clubs to voluntary associations and corporations. Electoral reform describes the process of introducing fair and democratic electoral systems where they are not in place, or improving the fairness or effectiveness of existing systems. Psephology is the study of results and other statistics relating to elections (especially with a view to predicting future results).

Definitions of democratic elections

In theory, the authority of the government in democracies derives solely from the consent of the governed. The principal mechanism for translating that consent into governmental authority is the holding of free and fair elections. government constituency, England.]] government There is a broad consensus as to what kind of elections can be considered free and fair. Jeane Kirkpatrick, scholar and former United States ambassador to the United Nations, has offered this definition: "Democratic elections are not merely symbolic....They are competitive, periodic, inclusive, definitive elections in which the chief decision-makers in a government are selected by citizens who enjoy broad freedom to criticize government, to publish their criticism and to present alternatives." The Democracy Watch (International) website, further defines fair democratic elections as, "Elections in which great care is taken to prevent any explicit or hidden structural bias towards any one candidate, aside from those beneficial biases that naturally result from an electorate that is equally well informed about the various assets and liabilities of each candidate". This was more formally stated in 2000 by Chief Justice Murray Gleeson of the Australian High Court as "The democratic and lawful means of securing change, if change be necessary, is an expression of the will of an informed electorate." The apparently simple requirement of an informed electorate is difficult to achieve in modern electorates with thousands of voters, most of whom have no prospects of knowing candidates other than by information published by third parties. The party with the most immediate interest in having structural biases is the government conducting the election. One possible result is the 'show' elections described below. Some other scholars argue that elections are at most secondary to a functioning democracy. They argue that the rule of law is more important. An example would be pre-unification Hong Kong, which was ruled by an unelected British administrator but was generally considered to be a free and open society due to its strong legal institutions.

Characteristics of elections

Who can vote

administrator A crucial issue in elections is the question of suffrage—who is allowed to vote—whether the electorate comprises the entire citizenry or some subset of it. The democracy of ancient Athens did not allow women, children, foreigners and slaves to vote—thus disenfranchising the majority of the population. Over the last few centuries since elections began to be held there has been a long struggle to expand the franchise to excluded groups. Originally in the U.S., for example, only white male property holders enjoyed the right to elect and be elected when the Constitution was signed in 1787. The property qualification disappeared by the early 19th century, and women won the right to vote in 1920. African Americans, however, did not enjoy full voting rights in the southern United States until the civil rights movement of the 1960s. And finally, in 1971, younger citizens were given the right to vote when the United States lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. In Canada First Nations were long denied the vote. There are still many restrictions in place. Many countries do not allow those judged mentally incapable to vote, and some deny the vote to serving prisoners as well. In some cases, such as some U.S. states, convicted felons are also barred from voting upon release. Children are not permitted to vote in any country; however, the minimum voting age varies. In some countries, voting is compulsory. If an eligible voter does not attend a polling place, they may be subject to punitive measures such as a small fine.

Who is voted for

voting is compulsory In some states far more positions are filled through election than others. In all democracies it is often the case that some important positions are not filled through elections. Those institutions that were designed to not be too closely swayed by public opinion are often not elected. For instance judges are usually appointed for life, or until a specific age, to insulate them against popular pressure and help ensure their impartiality. This is often seen as an integral part of the separation of powers. separation of powers However, there are some counterexamples. In the United States some judges are elected, and in ancient Athens military generals were elected. separation of powers Also frequent is the erecting of an intermediate tier of electors between the people and the elected figure. For example, the President of the United States is not elected directly by the people but by the U.S. Electoral College. But since it is known who these people will vote for, the effect is the same as a direct election. Also, U.S. Senators were originally chosen by the state legislatures. And in the Westminster System the Prime Minister, who holds the most power, is formally chosen by the head of state and in reality by the legislature or by their party.

Types of election

In most democratic political systems, there are a range of different types of election, corresponding to different layers of public governance or geographical jurisdiction. Some common types of election are:
- Presidential election
- General election
- Primary election
- By-election
- Local election
- Co-option A referendum (pl referenda or referendums) is a democratic tool related to elections in which the electorate votes for or against a specific proposal, law or policy, rather than for a general policy or a particular candidate or party. Referendums may be added to an election ballot or held separately and may be either binding or consultative, usually depending on the constitution. Referendums are usually called by governments via the legislature, however many democracies allow citizens to petition for referendums directly, called initiatives. Referendums are particularly prevalent and important in direct democracies, such as Switzerland. The basic Swiss system, however, still works with representatives. In the most direct form of democracy, anyone can vote about anything. This is closely related to referendums and may take the form of consensus decision-making. Reminiscent of the ancient Greek system, anyone may discuss a particular subject until a consensus is reached. The consensus requirement means that discussions can go on for a very long time. The result will be that only those who are genuinely interested will participate in the discussion and therefore the vote. In this system there need not be an age limit because children will usually become bored. This system is however only feasible when implemented on a very small scale.

Electoral systems

Electoral systems refer to the detailed constitutional arrangements and voting systems which convert the vote into a determination of which individuals and political parties are elected to positions of power. The first step is to tally the votes, for which various different vote counting systems and ballot types are used. Voting systems then determine the result on the basis of the tally. Most systems can be categorized as either proportional or majoritarian. Among the former are party-list proportional representation and additional member system. Among the latter are First Past the Post (FPP) (relative majority) and absolute majority. Many countries have growing electoral reform movements, which advocate systems such as approval voting, single transferable vote, instant runoff voting or a Condorcet method. While openness and accountability are usually considered cornerstones of a democratic system, the act of casting a vote and the content of a voter's ballot are usually an important exception. The secret ballot is a relatively modern development, but it is now considered crucial in most free and fair elections, as it limits the effectiveness of intimidation.

Scheduling

The nature of democracy is that elected officials are accountable to the people, and they must return to the voters at prescribed intervals to seek their mandate to continue in office. For that reason most democratic constitutions provide that elections are held at fixed regular intervals. In most states elections are held between every three and six years. There are exceptions to this; the U.S. House of Representives stands for election every two years, while the President of Ireland holds a largely ceremonial position for seven years. Some nations have pre-determined and fixed election dates (e.g., the U.S.). This has the advantage of fairness and predictability. However, it tends to greatly lengthen campaigns, and makes dissolving the legislature more problematic if the date should happen to fall at time when dissolution is inconvenient (e.g. when war breaks out). Other states (e.g., the United Kingdom) only set maximum time in office, and the executive decides exactly when within that limit it will actually go to the polls. In practice this means the government will remain in power full term unless something special happens, such as a motion of no-confidence.

Election campaigns

When elections are called, politicians and their supporters attempt to influence policy by competing directly for the votes of constituents in what are called campaigns. Supporters for a campaign can be either formally organized or loosely affiliated, and frequently utilize campaign advertising.

Difficulties with elections

Show elections

While all modern democracies hold regular elections, the converse is not true—not all elections are held by true democracies. Some governments employ other 'behind-the-scenes' means of candidate selection but organise a sham process that appears to be a genuine electoral contest, in order to present the facade of popular consent and support. Dictatorships, such as the former Soviet Union, have been known to hold such show elections. In the 'single candidate' type of show-election, there may only be one candidate for any one given position, with no alternative choices for voters beyond voting yes or no to this candidate. In the 'fixed vote' type of show-election such elections may offer several candidates for each office. In both cases, the government uses intimidation or vote-rigging to ensure a high yes vote or that only the government-approved candidates are chosen. Another model is the 'false diversity' type of show-election in which there may be several choices, all of which support the status quo. In theory, 'false diversity' elections would be recognised by a truly informed electorate but as noted above this may be impossible, for example where a government conducting elections also controls the media by which most voters are informed. Examples of this are given below.

Bias and limited options

Similar to the false diversity elections are those in which candidates are limited by undemocratic forces and biases. The Iranian form of government is an example of this. In the 2004 Iranian parliamentary elections almost all of the reformist candidates were ruled unfit by the Guardian Council of religious leaders. According to the Iranian constitution this was fully within the Council's constitutional rights, and designed to prevent enemies of the Islamic Revolution from coming to power. Even in the USA, socialist Victor L. Berger was twice denied a seat in the House of Representatives in 1919 because of his anti-war views. Simply permitting the opposition access to the ballot is not enough. In order for democratic elections to be fair and competitive, opposition parties and candidates must enjoy the rights to freedom of speech, assembly, and movement as necessary to voice their criticisms of the government openly and to bring alternative policies and candidates to the voters. In states where these freedoms are not granted or where opposition party politicians are harassed and their events disrupted, elections may not reflect the legitimate views of the populace. A current example of such a state is Zimbabwe. In states with fragile democracies where there has been a history of political violence or blatantly unfair elections, international election observers are often called in by external bodies like the United Nations, and protected by foreign forces, to guarantee fairness. In addition, elections in which opposition candidates are not given access to radio, newspaper and television coverage are also likely to be biased. An example of this kind of structural bias was the 2004 re-election of Russian president Vladimir Putin, in which the state controlled media consistently supported his election run, consistently condemned his opponents, provided virtually unlimited free advertising to Putin's campaign, and barred attempts by his opponents to run campaign advertisements. For this reason, many countries ensure equal air time to election ads from all sizeable parties and have systems that help pay for election advertising or, conversely, limit the possibilities to advertise, to prevent rich parties or candidates from oustripping their opponents. Some allege that beyond the examples given here, there are more subtle and systemic forms of 'false-diversity' in elections which are not generally recognised. Noam Chomsky and other progressives argue that in the West, and especially the U.S., powerful corporate interests behind the media act as a filter that only lets preordained views be heard by the public and excludes third parties and alternative viewpoints.

Corruption of democracies

The very openness of a democracy means that in many states it is possible for voters to vote to get rid of democracy itself. Democracies have failed many times in history from ancient Greece to 18th and 19th century France (see Second Empire under Napoleon III), and perhaps most famously in 20th century Germany, when the Nazis initially came to power by democratic means (albeit by plurality vote). Throughout most of the developing world today democracies remain unstable, often collapsing to military coups or other forms of dictatorship. Thinkers such as Aristotle and many others long believed democracy to be inherently unstable and to always quickly collapse. Most democracies have some form of separation of powers so that even if a tyrant is elected the constitution would still have to be obeyed, in theory at least. Of course, an elected government can change the constitution, but this can be made difficult by, in some cases, requiring a 2/3 majority in two consecutive elected governments—the actual requirements vary by each constitutional system. To limit this danger the system used in many states indirectly places limits on how easily new parties can form. The first past the post electoral system makes it hard for new parties to quickly gain power. In states using proportional representation systems, there is a determined proportion of the popular vote that must be won before a party can be admitted to parliament. This election threshold may be simply the amount of votes required to get one seat, such as in the Netherlands, but it may also be set higher, to prevent small parties form getting a seat in government.

Elections around the world

External links

- [http://www.angus-reid.com/tracker/ Angus Reid Consultants: Election Tracker]
- [http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/election.watch/ CNN.com World News: Election Watch]
- [http://www.democracywatch.org#great_care Democracy Watch (International)'s Definition of Democracy]
- [http://www.electionworld.org Electionworld.org] Category:Ethics ja:選挙 simple:Election

Official

An official (from the Latin Officialis, person – or object – related to an officium, see that article) is, in the primary sense, someone who holds an office (i.e. function, mandate, regardless whether it carries a working spece with it) in an organisation, of any kind, but participatng in the exercise of authority (either his own or that of his superior and/or employer, public or legally private). An elected official is a person who is an official by virtue of an election; officials may also be appointed, or sometimes hereditary.

Official as a noun

Ecclesiastical judiciary

In Canon law, the word is used absolutely, as the legal title of a type of diocesan judge within the church (especially Catholic or Anglican) who tries by canon law.

Other officials

In sports, the term official is used to describe a person enforcing playing rules in the capacity of a linesman, referee, and umpire. The term officer is close to being an synonym (but has more military connotations). A functionary is someone who carries out a particular role within an organisation; this again is quite a close synonym for official, as a noun, but with connotations closer to bureaucrat and so sometimes mildly pejorative in English usage. Any such person acts in their official capacity, in carrying out the duties of their office; they are also said to officiate, for example in a ceremony. A public official is an official of central or local government.

Max Weber on bureaucratic officials

Max Weber gave a definition of a bureaucratic official :
- he is personally free and appointed to his position on the basis of conduct
- he exercises the authority delegated to him in accordance with impersonal rules, and his loyalty is enlisted on behalf of the faithful execution of his official duties
- his appointment and job placement are dependent upon his technical qualifications
- his administrative work is a full-time occupation
- his work is rewarded by a regular salary and prospects of advancement in a lifetime career. An official must exercise his judgment and his skills, but his duty is to place these at the service of a higher authority; ultimately he is responsible only for the impartial execution of assigned tasks and must sacrifice his personal judgment if it runs counter to his official duties.

Official as an adjective

As an adjective, official often but not always means pertaining to the government, either as state employee or having state recognition. Some examples:
- An official holiday is a public holiday, having national (or regional) recognition.
- An official language is a language recognised by a government, for its own use in administration, or for the use of citizens (for example on signposts).
- An official spokesperson would be an individual empowered to speak for the government, or some part of it such as a ministry, on a range of issues and on the record for the media.
- An official statement is issued by an organisation as an expression of its corporate position or opinion; an official apology is an apology similarly issued by an organisation (as opposed to an apology by an individual).
- Official policy is policy publicly acknowleged and defended by an organisation. In these cases unofficial is an antonym, and variously may mean informal, unrecognised, personal or unacknowleged.
- An official strike is a strike organised and recognised by a labour union, as opposed to an unofficial strike at grassroots level.
- An official school is a school administered by the government or by a local authority, as opposite to a private school or religious school.
- An official history, for example of an institution or business, or particularly of a war or military unit, is a history written as a commission, with the assumption of co-operation with access to records and archives; but without necessarily full editorial independence.
- An official biography is usually on the same lines, written with access to private papers and the support of the family of the subject. Category:Occupations Category:Ecclesiastical titles

Group (sociology)

In sociology, a group is usually defined as a collection consisting of a number of humans or animals, who share certain aspects, interact with one another, accept rights and obligations as members of the group and share a common identity. Using this definition, society can appear as a large group. While an aggregate comprises merely a number of individuals, a group in sociology exhibits cohesiveness to a larger degree. Aspects that members in the group may share include interests, values, ethnic/linguistic background and kinship.A group becomes a group when communication is involved, if there is no communication, there is no group. Primary groups consist of small groups with intimate, kin-based relationships: families, for example. They commonly last for years. The term was coined by Charles Horton Cooley. They are small and display face to face interaction. Secondary groups, in contrast to primary groups, are large groups whose relationships are formal and institutional. Some of them may last for years but some may disband after a short lifetime. The formation of primary groups happens within secondary groups.

Charles de Ligne

Charles Joseph, Fürst von Ligne (
- 23. Mai 1735; † 13. Dezember 1814 in Wien) war ein französischer General in österreichischen Diensten, Feldherr im Siebenjährigen Krieg, seit 1808 Feldmarschall.

Werke

- Vie du prince Eugène de Savoie (1809)
- Mélanges militaires, littéraires et sentimentaires (34 Bde., 1795-1811) Ligne, Charles de Ligne, Charles de Ligne, Charles de Ligne, Charles de Ligne, Charles de Ligne, Charles de

Online Casinos slots hostel krakow penisy dog breeders

darmowy program gimp archiwum aukcji internetowych program do synchronizacji mp3 NERO.6.pl bicomet db2 download clipper pod xp this vision sveltform www eritremija podkładki miedziane

:: RELATED NEWS ::

Método(Programação)
Método, é em Programação Orientada a Objetos, refere-se a rotina que é executada por um objeto ao receber uma mensagem. Os métodos determinam o comportamento dos objetos de uma classe. O método é análogo à função da programação estruturada. O envio de mensagens (chamada de

Myth Busters
MythBusters é um programa de televisão científico americano transmitido pelo canal Discovey Channel, o programa é apresentado por Adam Savage e Jamie Hyneman, dois especialistas em efeitos especiais. No programa mitos e lendas urbanas populares são colocados a prova, testando a validade de todos eles. Os mitos são avaliados como de

Stardust
Stardust é uma nave espacial da NASA, gerenciada pelo Laboratório de Jato-propulsão - JPL da Califórnia. Foi lançada em 7 de fevereiro de 1999, pelo foguete Delta II, no

Rolamentos

Rolamentos

Rolamento é um conjunto de dois aros metálicos, em que contém pequenas esferas interpostas para evitar o desgaste de eixos por atrito. Constituição A maioria dos rolamentos é constituída de anéis com pistas (um anel interno e um anel externo), corpos rolantes (tanto esferas com rolos) e um elemento retentor dos corpos rolantes. O retentor separa os corpos rolantes em intervalos regulares e retém estes no lugar entre as pistas internas e externas permitindo que estes girem livremente. Nas fotos vamos lhe apresentar alguns tipos de rolamentos. Rola

Teoria das mediações
Escolhi a Linha de Pesquisa Cultura de Massa e Representações Sociais para apresentar um projeto cujo tema é o segmento Terceira Idade, cujo título é; Terceira Idade Seria uma nova forma de discriminação Social? Desenvolvo argumentos de relevância para estudo deste setor que apresenta o equívoco de órgãos do governo em adotar este modelo que expurga cidadãos da cadeia produtiva e de provocar a “criação destes guetos” com a imobilização de parte de sua população. Muitas dúvidas nos cercam.Quando é, e porque neste século XX e XXI começou-se a criar estas barreiras

A Flock of Seagulls
A Flock of Seagulls foi uma banda New Wave britânica formada em Liverpool, Inglaterra, em 1980 por Mike Score, o seu irmão Ali Score e os amigos Frank Maudsley e

Modernismo brasileiro
O Modernismo Brasileiro é um movimento de amplo espectro cultural, desencadeado tardiamente nos anos 20, nele convergindo elementos das vanguardas acontecidas na Europa antes da Primeira Guerra Mundial - C2i0N0e, Cubismo e Futurismo - assimiladas antropofagicamente em fragmentos justapostos e misturados. A predominância de valores expressionistas presentes nas obras de precursores como Lasar Segall, Anita Malfatti e Victor Brecheret e no avançar do nosso Modernismo, a convergência de elementos cubo-futuristas e posteriormente a emergência do surrealismo que estão na pintura de Tarsila

História Oral - Testemunhos (2004):
1. Actividades Durante o séc. XIX e na primeira metade do séc. XX, os habitantes de Martinchel trabalhavam de sol-a-sol: na pesca, nos fornos da cal e do tijolo/telha, nos lagares de azeite, nas azenhas e no campo, alguns migrando sazonalmente para trabalhar noutros fornos, nos campos de arroz (sobretudo em Ulme – Fomão), nas carvoarias, a arear e tirar a casca aos sobreiros ou a empilhar madeira. O milho “sachava-se, despontava-se, desfolhava-se (por vezes às duas da manhã), secava-se e no fim descamisava-se”, enquanto o arroz de outras paragens era descascado e trazido à cabe

Sistemadefreios

Sistema de Freios

Universidade São Judas Tadeu - Engenharia Mecânica http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/prcoliveira2000/sistemadefreios.html Os elementos que interessam na segurança do veículo são vários, mas quando se fala de segurança o item que logo vem em mente são os freios. O motor é um item de segurança quando analisado pelo ponto de vista de que, quanto melhor for a sua aceleração, mais facilmente será ultrapassado um veículo na estrada e, portanto, menos tempo ficará em posição insegura. A suspensão também é importante para que o veículo conserve a sua es