# Introduction.
#
Gold was an especially common form of early money, as described in [http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/origins.html Origins of Money and of Banking]
category:Business
-
City
:
For alternate meanings see city (disambiguation)
A city is an
urban area that is differentiated from a
town,
village, or
hamlet by
size,
population density, importance, or
legal status.
Introduction
In most parts of the world, cities are generally substantial and nearly always have an urban
core, but in the
United States many incorporated areas which have a very modest population, or a
suburban or even mostly
rural character, are designated as cities.
City can also be a synonym for "
downtown" or a "
city centre".
A city usually consists of
residential,
industrial and
business areas together with
administrative functions which may relate to a wider
geographical area. A large share of a city's area is primarily taken up by
housing, which is then supported by
infrastructure such
roads,
streets and often
public transport routes such as a
subway or a
metro rail system.
Lakes and
rivers may be the only undeveloped areas within the city. The study of cities is covered extensively in
human geography.
"The city is a human habitat that allows people to form relations with others at various levels of intimacy while remaining entirely anonymous." (This definition was the subject of an exhibition at the Israeli pavilion at the 2000
Venice Biennale of architecture)
The difference between towns and cities
The difference between
towns and
cities is differently understood in different parts of the
English speaking world. There is no one standard international definition of a city: the term may be used either for a town possessing city status; for an urban locality exceeding an arbitrary population size; for a town dominating other towns with particular regional economic or administrative significance. Although
city can refer to an
agglomeration including
suburban and satellite areas, the term is not appropriate for a
conurbation (cluster) of
distinct urban places, nor for a wider
metropolitan area including more than one city, each acting as a focus for parts of the area.
In the
United Kingdom, a
city is a town which has been known as a city since
time immemorial, or which has received city status by
royal charter — which is normally granted on the basis of size, importance or royal connection (traditional pointers have been whether the town has a
cathedral or a
university). Some cathedral cities, for example
St. David's in
Wales, are quite small, and may not be known as cities in common parlance. (See the
City status in the United Kingdom.) A similar system existed in the medieval
Low Countries where a landlord would grant settlements
certain privileges (
city rights) that settlements without city rights didn't have. This include the privilege to put up city walls, hold markets or set up a judicial
court.
In
Australia and
New Zealand,
city is used to refer both to units of local government, and as a synonym for urban area. For instance the [http://www.southperth.wa.gov.au City of South Perth] is part of the urban area known as
Perth, commonly described as a city. On the other hand,
Gisborne in New Zealand is known as the first city to see the sun, despite being administered by a district council, not a city council.
An interesting phenomenon in
American English is the generalisation of the term
city to all
settlements. Britons may be bemused by forms with fields headed, not
Town and
Postal code, but
City and
ZIP, even though the person needing to fill it in could be living in a city, a town without city status, or even a village or hamlet.
In turn, many Americans often talk of "City Halls" when referring to
town halls in quite small
European towns and villages.
Strangely, even though Americans are well aware that "village" means something smaller than a town, the word has often been co-opted by enterprising developers to make their projects sound welcoming and friendly. The result are so-called villages with 20 and 30-story high-rises, like
Westwood Village in Los Angeles.
Geography
Westwood Village, of around 1550. The city is completely surrounded by a city wall and defensive canal. The square shape is inspired by Jerusalem.]]
The geographies of cities, both
physical and human, are diverse. Often cities will either be
coastal and have a
harbour or be situated near a
river giving
economic advantage.
Water transports on
rivers and
oceans were (and in most cases still are) cheaper and more efficient than
road transport over long distances.
Older
European cities often have historically intact central areas where the streets are jumbled together, seemingly without a structural plan. This quality is a legacy of earlier unplanned or organic development, and is often perceived by today's
tourists to be picturesque.
Modern city planning has seen many different schemes for how a city should look. The most commonly seen pattern is the
grid, almost a rule in parts of the
United States, and used for thousands of years in
China.
Derry was the first ever
planned city in Ireland, begun in
1613, with the walls being completed 5 years later in
1618. The central diamond within a walled city with four gates was thought to be a good design for defence. The grid pattern chosen was subsequently much copied in the colonies of British North America [http://worldfacts.us/UK-Londonderry.htm]. However, the grid has been used for a long time in history. The Greeks gave their colonies around the Mediterranian often with a grid. One of the best examples around is the city of
Priene. This city even had it's different districts. Much like modern city planning today. Also in de Medival times we see a preference for lineair planning. Good examples are the cities establish in the south of France by various rulers. And city expantions in old Dutch and Flanders cities.
Other forms may include a radial structure in which main roads converge on a central point, often the effect of successive growth over long time with concentric traces of
town walls and
citadels - recently supplemented by ring-roads that take traffic around the edge of a town. Many
Dutch cities are structured that way: a central square surrounded by a concentric canals. Every city expansion would imply a new circle (canals + town walls). In cities like
Amsterdam and
Haarlem this pattern is still clearly visible.
History of cities
Towns and cities have a long history, although opinions vary on whether any particular ancient settlement can be considered to be a city. The first true towns are sometimes considered to be large settlements where the inhabitants were no longer simply farmers of the surrounding area, but began to take on specialized occupations, and where to trade, food storage and power was centralized. Societies that live in cities are often called
civilizations.
By this definition, the first towns we know of were located in
Mesopotamia, such as
Ur, and along the
Nile, the
Indus Valley Civilization and
China. Before this time it was rare for settlements to reach significant size, although there were exceptions such as
Jericho,
Çatalhöyük and
Mehrgarh.
The growth of ancient and
medieval empires led to ever greater
capital cities and seats of provincial administration, with
ancient Rome, its eastern successor
Constantinople and successive
Chinese and later
Indian capitals approaching or exceeding the half-million population level. It is estimated that ancient Rome population exceeded one million people by the end of the last century BCE, which is considered the only city to reach that number until the
Industrial Revolution, however,
Alexandria population was close to one million at the same time. Similar large administrative, commercial, industrial and ceremonial centres emerged in other areas, though on a smaller scale.
During the European
Middle Ages, a town was as much a political entity as a collection of houses. City residence brought freedom from customary rural obligations to lord and community:
"Stadtluft macht frei" ("City air makes you free") was a saying in Germany. In
Continental Europe cities with a legislature of their own wasn't unheard of, the laws for towns as a rule other than for the countryside, the lord of a town often being another than for surrounding land. In the
Holy Roman Empire (i.e. medieval Germany and Italy) some cities had no other lord than the emperor.
In exceptional cases like
Venice,
Genoa or
Lübeck, cities themselves became powerful states, sometimes taking surrounding areas under their control or establishing extensive maritime empires. Similar phenomena existed elsewhere, as in the case of
Sakai, which enjoyed a considerable autonomy in late medieval Japan.
Most towns remained far smaller places, so that in
1500 only some two dozen places in the world contained more than 100,000 inhabitants: as late as
1700 there were fewer than forty, a figure which would rise thereafter to 300 in
1900. A small city of the early modern period might contain as few as 10,000 inhabitants, a town far fewer still.
While the
city-states, or
poleis, of the
Mediterranean and
Baltic Sea languished from the
16th century, Europe's larger capitals benefited from the growth of commerce following the emergence of an
Atlantic economy fuelled by the silver of
Peru. By the
18th century,
London and
Paris rivalled the well-developed regionally-traditional capital cities of
Baghdad,
Beijing,
Istanbul,
Kyoto and
Venice.
The growth of modern
industry from the late
18th century onward led to massive
urbanization and the rise of new great cities, first in Europe and then in other regions, as new opportunities brought huge numbers of
migrants from rural communities into urban areas. In the
Great Depression of the 1930s
cities were hard hit by unemployment, especially those with a base in heavy industry. Today the world's population is about half urban, with millions still streaming annually into the growing cities of
Asia,
Africa and
Latin America.
Modern conceptions
Traditional approach
A universal
linear approach to cities has been in place and accepted for a long time. As this approach falls short of explaining a number of aspects of city life, such as the diversity between cities, new ways have been sought. Influenced by
post-structuralist thinking a new approach was born: using spatial thinking it is possible to not only fill the gaps, but indeed replace the old completely.
Three characteristics have been identified as defining a city: the number of people to area (density), the
networks of the city, as well as a particular way of life. None of these characteristics alone is enough to make a place a city.
Until recently cities were almost exclusively viewed as part of a single, linear line of development. Starting with the
Greek city-state, this linear approach placed each city somewhere, and it was believed that it was only a matter of time until the next stage along the prescript path of advancement was reached. For each stage an exemplar was identified. Step by step from
Athens onwards to
Venice and
London,
Los Angeles seemed to be the ultimate stage of a postmodern city. Such an approach regarded a city as a single static entity, which could be studied disconnected in time and space. This leads to a theoretical framework with little connection to real cities, but these were simply seen as less clear examples. In spite of apparent shortcomings, this approach is still very commonplace in respected and popular publications.
Shortcomings
Despite its wide acceptance this traditional approach to cities had serious shortcomings. Firstly, leaving the latest stage aside, it was completely eurocentric. It was believed that every city in the world could be compared with a past stage in the history of one
European city. Secondly, there was no real explanation when and how changes occurred, how another stage in the line of development was achieved. There seemed no need to follow the changes of one city, but instead attention was turned to another exemplar. Thirdly, the disconnected view of cities is problematic. It implies that history, culture and connections of a place do not influence a place, which is questionable. Some thinkers argue that a history ignoring connections is necessary incomplete. Fourthly, the traditional approach failed to define what makes a city. It is unclear why one place is regarded as a city while another one is not.
Lewis Mumford argued in 1937 for a social dimension, describing cities as
geographical plexuses. Finally, viewing cities as a single body misses modern conceptions that there is more than one story to a place. The city of an
aristocrat will surely differ from that of a
slave. This also reflects a shift away from one single history of the powerful élites (often referred to as
city élites) to a multidimensional perception of history. The notion of
city rhythms has been introduced to highlight the different aspects of city life...
The term
city can be used to mean either an area of contiguous urbanization or a particular municipality (an [http://www.demographia.com/db-world-muni.htm area within the political borders of an incorporated municipality]). There is a substantial variation in municipalities around the world. The largest municipality, Chongqing, is approximately the same size as the state of Indiana and contains much more rural territory than continuous urbanization. In most cases, however, the continuous urbanization popularly thought of as the city extends well beyond the boundaries of the core incorporated city.
Modern approach
As a modern approach to cities, urban thinking analyzes various issues that arise in urban areas. It focuses largely upon
connections and internal divisions which helps create a better understanding of the dynamics of cities. Using such spatial thinking, it is possible to understand various aspects for which the traditional approach did not provide an adequate explanation.
One important aspect of spatial thinking is looking at the connections of a city. Such connections allow one to understand the unique character of a place. Rather than treating all cities the same, places are seen as interconnected through networks of culture, economics, trade or history. So while
London and
Tokyo are economically linked through stock markets,
Graz and
Stockholm are linked via the
Cultural Capital of Europe.
These networks overlap and are concentrated in cities. Arguably this concentration of networks creates a unique feeling of a place. Such networks, however, do not only link cities with cities, but also a city to its surroundings. The notion of a
city footprint reflects the idea that a city on its own is not sustainable: it depends on produce from its surroundings, it needs trade links and other connections for
economic viability. Looking at networks, it becomes possible to explain the rise and fall of cities. This has to do with the changing importance of connections and is maybe best illustrated with the arrival of
Spanish colonizers in
America. Within a short time, connections to
Madrid became more important than connections to the former centre
Tenochtitlán.
The concentration of networks in cities can be used as an explanation of
urbanization. It is the access to certain networks that attracts people. As various networks spatially run together in a confined area, people gather in cities. At the same time, this concentration of people means the introduction of new networks, such as social links, increasing the creation of new possibilities within cities. Urban social movements are a direct result of this possibility of making new connections. It is this openness to new connections that makes cities both attractive and to a certain degree unpredictable.
Another important aspect of modern urban thinking is looking at the divisions within a city. This internal differentiation is linked to the external connections of a city. As places of meeting
histories, cities are hybrid and heterogeneous. Hybrid they are as the connections which link places are bilateral, involving giving and taking in both directions. Heterogeneous they are because of the dynamism of cities. New encounters are ongoing processes where social relations and differences are constantly negotiated and shaped, reflecting the unequal
power involved.
Neither the internal differentiations nor the connections and
networks of a place on their own define a city. Internal divisions are caused by external links, while at the same time connections to the outside open up the possibility of new
social divisions. Divisions and connections in every city are intertwined, and only by considering both aspects of spatial thinking the complexity of cities is approachable.
Immigration illustrates this interconnection of external networks and internal divisions well. The networks concentrated in the core of the city attract immigrants. As they immigrate, the newcomers bring along their histories, bringing new networks or enforcing existing ones. At the same time, their history offers opportunities to identify with or likewise exclude. Division and connection come hand in hand. Rather than attempting to eradicate such tensions and contradictions in the theoretical framework, modern urban thinking – influenced by poststructuralist thought – accounts for both sides. Static universal bodies are replaced by multidimensional networks, allowing for fluidity and dynamism.
Global cities
A
global city, also known as a
world city, is a prominent centre of
trade,
banking,
finance, innovations, and
markets. The term "global city", as opposed to megacity, was coined by
Saskia Sassen in a seminal 1991 work. Whereas "megacity" refers to any city of enormous size, a global city is one of enormous power or influence. Global cities, according to Sassen, have more in common with each other than with other cities in their host nations.
Bangkok,
Beijing,
Brussels,
Chicago,
Hong Kong,
Johannesburg,
London,
Moscow,
Mumbai,
New York,
Los Angeles,
Paris,
São Paulo,
Seoul,
Shanghai,
Singapore,
Sydney,
Tokyo, and
Toronto are commonly referred to as global cities, however, the term is also applied to other cities.
The notion of global cities regards the power of cities as contained within cities. The city is seen as a container where skills and resources are concentrated. The more successful city is able to concentrate more of these skills and resources. This makes the city itself more powerful in terms that it can influence what is happening around the world. Following this view of cities, it is possible to
rank the world's cities hierarchically (John Friedmann and Goetz Wolff, "World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6, no. 3 (1982): 319.).
Critics of the notion point out to the different realms of power. The term
global city narrowly focuses on economics. Cities like
Rome are powerful in
religious terms. Additionally, it has been questioned whether the city itself can be regarded as an actor.
In
1995 Kanter argued that successful cities can be identified by three elements. To be successful, a city needs to have good thinkers (concepts), good makers (competence) or good traders (
connections). The interplay of these three elements, Kanter argued, means that good cities are not planned but managed.
Environmental effects
Modern cities are known for creating their own
microclimates. This is due to the large clustering of hard surfaces that heat up in
sunlight and that channel
rainwater into underground ducts. As a result, city weather is often windier and cloudier than the weather in the surrounding countryside. Conversely, because these effects make cities warmer (
urban heat shield or
urban heat islands) than the surrounding area,
tornadoes tend to go around cities. Additionally towns can cause significant downstream weather effects.
Garbage and
sewage are two major problems for cities, as is
air pollution coming from
internal combustion engines (see
public transport). The impact of cities on places elsewhere, be it hinterlands or places far away, is considered in the notion of
city footprinting (
ecological footprint).
Inner city
Main article: Inner city
In the United States, United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, the term "inner city" is sometimes used with the connotation of being an area, perhaps a
ghetto, where people are less educated and wealthy and where there is more crime. These connotations are less common in other Western countries, as deprived areas are located in varying parts of other Western cities. In fact, with the
gentrification of some formerly run-down central city areas the reverse connotation can apply - in Australia the term "outer suburban" applied to a person implies a lack of sophistication. For instance, in
Paris the inner city is the richest part of the metropolitan area, where housing is the most expensive, and where elites and high-income individuals dwell.
The United States, in particular, suffers from a culture of anti-urbanism that some say dates back as far as Thomas Jefferson who wrote that "The mobs of great cities add just so much to the support of pure government as sores do to the strength of the human body." On the businessmen who brought manufacturing industry into cities and hence increased the population density necessary to supply the workforce, he wrote "the manufactures of the great cities... have begotten a depravity of morals, a dependence and corruption, which renders them an undesirable accession to a country whose morals are sound." Modern anti-urban attitudes are to be found in America in the form of a planning profession that continues to develop land on a low-density suburban basis, where access to amenities, work and shopping is provided almost exclusively by car rather than on foot.
However, there is a growing movement in North America called "
New Urbanism" that calls for a return to traditional city planning methods where mixed-use zoning allows people to walk from one type of land-use to another. The idea is that housing, shopping, office space, and leisure facilities are all provided within walking distance of each other, thus reducing the demand for road-space and also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of
mass transit.
See also
Lists
-
List of cities by country
-
List of cities by latitude
-
List of metropolitan areas by population
-
Thirty most populous cities in the world
-
List of city nicknames
-
List of fictional cities
Miscellaneous
-
City status in Sweden
-
City status in the United Kingdom
-
benign neglect
-
The City
-
County
-
Independent city
-
Megacity
-
municipal government
-
global city
-
planned city
-
urban geography
-
urban planning
-
Ville
-
Burning Man, a week-long
festival as a temporary city (housing 35,000 residents in
2004)
-
SimCity, a popular series of city simulators, sometimes used in education.
-
Freedom Ship, concept for a floating city
References
- Toynbee, Arnold (ed),
Cities of Destiny, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967. Pan historical/geographical essays, many images. Starts with "Athens", ends with "The Coming World City-Ecumenopolis".
External links
- [http://www.populationdata.net/palmaresvilles.html All 1M+ major urban areas]
- [http://www.p.lodz.pl/I35/personal/jw37/EUROPE/europe.html Place Names of Europe]
- [http://www.tageo.com/index.htm Place Names of the world - Index of 2M cities]
- [http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/geo_lar_cit&int=-1&b_ac=1 Most populous city of each country]
- [http://www.world-gazetteer.com/st/statb.htm For all countries, number of cities per size category]
- [http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/geo_lar_cit_pop_cap&int=-1 For each country, part of its population that lives in its most populous city] (with some odd figures due to the comparison of data of different years)
- [http://www.nlc.org/nlc_org/site/ The National League of Cities] (United States)
- [http://www.innercitypress.org Inner City Press] (Weekly publication on cities, United States)
- [http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-52
Dictionary of the History of ideas:] The City
- [http://www.morganquitno.com/cit05list.htm Morgan Quinto's 11th Annual America's Safest (and Most Dangerous) Cities]
- [http://www.skyscraperpage.com A friendly website designed by skyscraper enthusiasts featuring diagrams and descriptions of the buildings of cities around the world.]
- [http://www.bifurcaciones.cl bifurcaciones.cl, urban cultural studies journal]
- [http://worldheritage-forum.net/de/ Worldheritage-Forum] Weblog and Informationen on UNESCO World Heritage topics (with focus on cities)
Category:Urban studies and planning
Category:Cities
ja:都市
ja:市
nb:By
simple:city
th:เมือง
Metropolitan borough
A metropolitan borough (or metropolitan district) is a type of
local government district in
England, covering urban areas within
Metropolitan Counties.
Origin of the term
Between
1899 and
1965, metropolitan boroughs were the sub-divisions of the
County of London. When
Greater London was created in 1965 they were replaced with larger
London boroughs.
Current usage
The current metropolitan boroughs were created in
1974 by the
Local Government Act 1972. New
metropolitan counties were created to cover the six largest urban areas in England outside of
Greater London, and these were subdivided into metropolitan boroughs. (The new authorities were actually defined as metropolitan
districts, but all of them have been granted Royal Charters and given
borough or
city status.)
Metropolitan districts were originally part of a two-tier structure of local government, and shared power with the metropolitan county councils (MCCs). They differed from
Non-metropolitan districts, in the division of powers between district and county councils. Metropolitan districts were
Local Education Authorities and were responsible for
social services — in non-metropolitan counties these services were the responsibility of
county councils.
In
1986 the metropolitan county councils were abolished (by the
Local Government Act 1985) and most of their functions were devolved to the boroughs, making them to a large extent
unitary authorities. However, this description is not normally used; although most of the functions of the MCCs were devolved to the boroughs, some of their functions were taken over by Joint Boards - the boroughs appoint Councillors to these boards to run some county-wide services, including Emergency Services, Public Transport, Waste Disposal and Civil Defence.
The metropolitan boroughs are:
For the historic London metropolitan boroughs see
County of London.
See also
-
Non-metropolitan district
-
County Borough
-
Subdivisions of England
-
Passenger Transport Executive
United Kingdom, Metropolitan Borough
Category:Local government of the United Kingdom
Category:Boroughs of the United Kingdom
England
:
For an explanation of often-confusing terms like England
, (
Great)
Britain and United Kingdom see British Isles (terminology).
England is a
nation and the largest and most populous
constituent country of the
United Kingdom accounting for more than 83% of the total
UK population. It occupies most of the southern two-thirds of the island of
Great Britain and shares land borders with fellow
home nations Scotland, to the north, and
Wales, to the west. Elsewhere, it is bordered by the sea.
England is named after the
Angles, one of a number of
Germanic tribes believed to have originated in
Angeln in Northern
Germany, who settled in England in the
5th and
6th centuries. It has not had a distinct political identity since
1707, when
Great Britain was established as a unified political entity; however, it has a legal identity separate from those of
Scotland and
Northern Ireland, as part of the entity "
England and Wales;". England's largest city,
London, is also the capital of the
United Kingdom.
History
Main article: History of England
England has been inhabited for at least 500,000 years, although the repeated
Ice Ages made much of Britain uninhabitable for extended periods until as recently as 20,000 years ago.
Stone Age hunter-gatherers eventually gave way to farmers and permanent settlements, with a spectacular and sophisticated
megalithic civilisation arising in western England some 4,000 years ago. It was replaced around 1,500 years later by Celtic tribes migrating from Western and continental Europe, mainly from France. These tribes were known collectively as "Britons", a name bestowed by
Phoenician
traders — an indication of how, even at this early date, the island was part of a Europe-wide trading network.
The Britons were significant players in continental politics and supported their allies in
Gaul militarily during the
Gallic Wars with the
Roman Republic. This prompted the Romans to invade and subdue the island, first with
Julius Caesar's raid in
55 BC, and then the Emperor
Claudius' conquest in the following century. The whole southern part of the island — roughly corresponding to modern day England and
Wales — became a prosperous part of the
Roman Empire. It was finally abandoned early in the
5th century when a weakening Empire pulled back its legions to defend borders on the Continent.
Unaided by the Roman army, Roman Britannia could not long resist the Germanic tribes who arrived in the
5th and
6th centuries, enveloping the majority of modern day England in a new culture and language and pushing Romano-British rule back into modern-day
Wales and western extremities of England, notably
Cornwall and
Cumbria. Others emigrated across the channel to modern-day
Brittany, thus giving it its name and language (
Breton). But many of the Romano-British remained in and were assimilated into the newly "English" areas.
The invaders fell into three main groups: the
Jutes, the
Saxons, and the
Angles. As they became more civilised, recognisable states formed and began to merge with one another. (The most well-known state of affairs being the Anglo-Saxon
heptarchy.) From time to time throughout this period, one Anglo-Saxon king, recognised as the "
Bretwalda" by other rulers, had effective control of all or most of the English; so it is impossible to identify the precise moment when the
Kingdom of England was unified. In some sense, real unity came as a response to the Danish
Viking incursions which occupied the eastern half of "England" in the
8th century.
Egbert, King of
Wessex (d.
839) is often regarded as the first king of all the English, although the title "King of England" was first adopted, two generations later, by
Alfred the Great (ruled
871–
899).
The principal legacy left behind in those territories from which the language of the Britons were displaced is that of toponyms. Many of the place-names in England and to a lesser extent Scotland are derived from celtic British names, including London, Dumbarton, York, Dorchester, Dover and Colchester. Several place-name elements are thought to be wholly or partly Brythonic in origin, particularly bre-, bal-, and -dun for hills, carr for a high rocky place, coomb for a small deep valley.
Until recently it has been believed that those areas settled by the Anglo-Saxons were uninhabited at the time or the Britons had fled before them. However, genetic studies show that the British were not pushed out to the Celtic fringes – many tribes remained in what was to become England (see C. Capelli et al.
A Y chromosome census of the British Isles. Current Biology 13, 979–984, (2003)). Capelli's findings strengthen the research of Steven Bassett of the
University of Birmingham; his work during the 1990s suggests that much of the West Midlands was only very lightly colonised with Anglian and Saxon settlements.
This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,—
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.
The English are great lovers of themselves, and of everything belonging to them; they think that there are no other men than themselves, and no other world but England; and whenever they see a handsome foreigner, they say that 'he looks like an Englishman', and that 'it is a great pity that he should not be an Englishmen'.
Venetian ambassador to England
Early 16th century
Charlotte Augusta Sneyd
Italian Relations of England (p. 20)
Richard II]
Richard II]
In
1066,
William the Conqueror and the Normans
conquered the existing Kingdom of England and instituted an
Anglo-Norman administration and nobility who, retaining proto-French as their language for the next three hundred years, ruled as custodians over English commoners. Although the language and racial distinctions faded rapidly during the middle ages, the class system born in the Norman/Saxon divide persisted longer — arguably with traces lasting to the modern day.
While
Old English continued to be spoken by common folk, Norman feudal lords significantly influenced the language with French words and customs being adopted over the succeeding centuries evolving to a Romance-Germanic hybrid of
Middle English widely spoken in Chaucer's time.
England came repeatedly into conflict with
Wales and
Scotland, at the time an independent principality and an independent kingdom respectively, as its rulers sought to expand Norman power across the entire island of Britain. The conquest of Wales was achieved in the 13th century, when it was annexed to England and gradually came to be a part of that kingdom for most legal purposes, although in the modern era it is more usually thought of as a separate
nation (fielding, for example, its own athletic teams). Norman power in Scotland waxed and waned over the years, with the Scots managing to maintain a varying degree of independence despite repeated wars with the English. Although it was on the whole only a moderately successful power in military terms, England became one of the wealthiest states in medieval Europe, due chiefly to its dominance in the lucrative
wool market.
The failure of English territorial ambitions in continental Europe prompted the kingdom's rulers to look further afield, creating the foundations of the mercantile and colonial network that was to become the
British Empire. The turmoil of the
Reformation embroiled England in religious wars with Europe's Catholic powers, notably
Spain, but the kingdom preserved its independence as much through luck as through the skill of charismatic rulers such as
Elizabeth I. Elizabeth's successor,
James I was already king of Scotland (as James VI); and this personal union of the two crowns into the crown of Great Brittaine was followed a century later by the
Act of Union 1707, which formally unified England, Scotland and Wales into the
Kingdom of Great Britain. This later became the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1801 to 1927) and then the modern state of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1927 to present)
For post-unification history, see
history of the United Kingdom.
Politics
Main article: Politics of the United Kingdom, Government of England
Since the promulgation of the 1284
Statute of Rhuddlan and the
Laws in Wales Acts 1535-1542,
Wales has shared a legal identity with England as the joint entity of
England and Wales. The
Act of Union with the Kingdom of
Scotland in 1707 created the
Kingdom of Great Britain, subsuming England, Wales and Scotland into a single political entity. Scotland, along with Northern Ireland, retain separate legal systems. The duchy of Cornwall also retains some unique rights.
All of Great Britain has been ruled by the government of the
United Kingdom since that date, although in 1999 the first elections to the newly created
Scottish Parliament and
National Assembly for Wales left England as the only part of the Union with no devolved assembly or parliament. As all legislation for England is passed by Parliament at Westminster there are some complaints about the ability of non-English Members of Parliament to influence purely English affairs. This apparent anomaly has been highlighted by both English and non-English politicians, often those opposed to
devolution, and has become popularly known as the
West Lothian question.
Administratively, England is something of an anomaly within the UK. Unlike the other three nations, it has no local parliament or government and its administrative affairs are dealt with by a combination of the UK government, the UK parliament and a number of England-specific
quangos, such as
English Heritage. There are calls from some for a
devolved English Parliament and from others for the dissolution of the UK and an independent England.
The current
Labour government favoured the establishment of regional administration, claiming that England was too large to be governed as a sub-state entity. A
referendum on this issue in
North East England on
4 November 2004 decisively rejected the proposal.
Some criticised the English regional proposals for not
decentralising enough, saying that they amounted not to devolution, but to little more than local government reorganisation, with no real power being removed from central government. The English regions would not even have had the limited powers of the
Welsh Assembly, much less the tax-varying and legislative powers of the
Scottish Parliament. Rather, power was simply re-allocated within the region, with little new resource allocation and no real prospects of Assemblies being able to change the pattern of regional aid. Responsibility for regional transport was added to the proposals late in the process. This was perhaps crucial in the North East, where resentment at the
Barnett Formula, which delivers greater regional aid to adjacent
Scotland, was a significant impetus for the North East devolution campaign. There has also been a campaign for a Cornish assembly along Welsh lines by groups such as
Mebyon Kernow, which recently collected 50,000 signatures in support.
Some
eurosceptics believe that the establishment of English regions as administrative entities is designed to undermine the concept of English nationhood and more easily fit England into a European federal model.
Conventionally the national capital of England is London, although technically it would be more exact to call London the capital of "England and Wales" given England's lack of a distinctive political identity separate from the Principality.
Winchester served as the country's first national capital until some time in the late 11th century after the
Norman Conquest. The City of London became England's commercial capital, while the City of Westminster (where the Royal court was located) became the political capital. These roles have, broadly speaking, been maintained to the present day.
Subdivisions
Main article: Subdivisions of England
Historically, the highest level of local government in England was the
county. These divisions had emerged from a range of units of old, pre-unification England, whether they were Kingdoms, such as
Essex and
Sussex;
Duchies, such as
Yorkshire,
Cornwall and
Lancashire or simply tracts of land given to some noble, as is the case with
Berkshire. Until 1867, they were subdivided into smaller divisions called
hundreds.
These counties all still exist in, or near to, their original form as the
traditional counties. In many places, however, they have been heavily modified or abolished outright as administrative counties. This came about due to a number of factors.
The fact that the counties were so small meant, and still means, that there was no regional government able to coordinate an overarching plan for the area. This was especially true in the metropolitan areas surrounding the cities, as the county lines were usually drawn up before the
industrial revolution and the mass urbanisation of England.
The solution was the creation of large
metropolitan counties centred on cities. These were later broken up, with several other counties, into
unitary authorities, unifying the county and district/borough levels of government.
London is a special case, and is the one
region which currently has a representative
authority as well as a directly elected
mayor. The 32
London boroughs and the
Corporation of London remain the local form of government in the city.
Other than
Greater London, the official regions are:
-
North East England
-
North West England
-
Yorkshire and the Humber
-
West Midlands
-
East Midlands
-
East of England
-
South West England
-
South East England
Outside London the regions have very little power and are not accountable to elected representatives; regional authority is placed in the hands of unelected assemblies. If, as now seems unlikely, regions opt to replace these bodies with elected assemblies,
local government in England will remain as variable and, some might say, as confusing as ever
Geography
Main articles: Geography of the United Kingdom, Geography of England
Geography of England
England comprises the central and southern two-thirds of the island of
Great Britain, plus offshore islands of which the largest is the
Isle of Wight. It is bordered to the north by
Scotland and to the west by
Wales. It is closer to continental Europe than any other part of Britain, divided from France only by a 38 km (24
statute mile or 21
nautical mile) sea gap.
Most of England consists of rolling hills, but it is more mountainous in the north with a chain of low mountains, the
Pennines, dividing east and west. The dividing line between terrain types is usually indicated by the
Tees-Exe line. There is also an area of flat, low-lying marshland in the east, much of which has been drained for agricultural use.
The list of England's largest cities is much debated because in
British English the normal meaning of
city is "a continuously built-up urban area"; these are hard to define and various other definitions are preferred by some people to boost the ranking of their own city.
London is by far the largest English city.
Manchester and
Birmingham vie for second place. A number of other cities, mainly in the north of England, are of substantial size and influence. These include:
Liverpool,
Leeds,
Newcastle,
Nottingham,
Bristol and
Sheffield Using the standard U.S.
city limits definition of a city the
top six are: Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield, Bradford, Liverpool and Manchester. Note that London is not on this list (
Greater London is a
region and the
City of London is tiny), and that one of the two candidates for the status of England's "second city", Manchester, is down in sixth. In the UK, this method of ranking cities is generally used only by people whose own city is promoted by it.
The
Channel Tunnel, near
Folkestone, links England to the
European mainland. The English/
French border is halfway along the tunnel.
The largest harbour in England is at
Poole, on the south-central coast. Internationally, it is the second largest harbour in the world, although this fact is disputed (See
harbors for a list of other potential second largest harbours)
The highest temperature ever recorded in England is 38.5
°C (101.3
°F) on
August 10,
2003 in
Kent. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/3153532.stm]. The lowest temperature ever recorded in England is -26.1
°C (-15.0
°F) on
January 10,
1982 at
Newport in
Shropshire. [http://www.metoffice.com/climate/uk/location/england/#temperature]
Major rivers
Shropshire.]]
-
Thames
-
Severn
-
Trent
-
Humber
-
Yorkshire Ouse
-
Tyne
-
Mersey
-
Dee
-
Avon
Main article: Waterways in the United Kingdom
Major Conurbations
:
See main article: List of towns in England
The largest cities in England are much debated but according to the urban area populations (continuous built up areas) these would be the 15 largest conurbations. (Population figures taken from 2001 census)
#
Greater London (8,278,251)
#
West Midlands (2,284,093)
#
Greater Manchester (2,244,931)
#
Leeds/
Bradford (1,499,465)
#
Tyneside (879,996)
#
Liverpool (816,216)
#
Nottingham (666,358)
#
Sheffield (640,720)
#
Bristol (551,066)
#
Brighton/Worthing/Littlehampton (461,181)
#
Portsmouth (442,252)
#
Leicester (441,213)
#
Bournemouth/Poole (383,713)
#
Reading (369,804)
#
Teesside (365,323)
Economy
Main article: Economy of England
Demographics
Main articles: Demographics of England, Population of England
England is both the most populous and the most ethnically diverse nation in the United Kingdom with around 49 million inhabitants, of which roughly a tenth are from non-White ethnic groups. It is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, second only to the
Netherlands.
This population is made up of, and descended from, immigrants who have arrived over millennia. The principal waves of migration have been in c. 600
BC (
Celts), the
Roman period (garrison soldiers from throughout the Empire), 350–550 (
Angles,
Saxons,
Jutes), 800–900 (
Vikings,
Danes), 1066 (
Normans), 1650–1750 (
European refugees and
Huguenots), 1840–1850 (
Irish), 1880–1940 (
Irish,
Jews), 1950— (
Irish,
Caribbeans,
Africans,
South Asians), 1985— (citizens of
European Community member states especially
Ireland,
East Europeans,
Iranians,
Kurds,
refugees).
The general prosperity of England as the largest partner of the UK, has also made it a destination for economic migrants particularly from
Ireland and
Scotland. This segment of English
homogeneous society continues to create a diverse and dynamic language that is widely used internationally. The other image of foreign ethnic components in England is still mostly seen as a legacy of the
British Empire; especially the
Commonwealth of Nations.
English identity
The simplest view is that an English person is someone who is from England and holds British nationality, regardless of his or her racial origin. However, inhabitants of England quite commonly refer to themselves as "British" rather than "English"; centuries of English dominance within the United Kingdom has created a situation where to be English is, as a
linguist would put it, an "unmarked" state (i.e. a British person, institution, custom, city, etc. is assumed English unless specified otherwise). The English frequently include their neighbours in the general term "British" while the Scots and Welsh, proud of their separate identities, tend to be more forward about referring to themselves by one of those more specific terms. Although currently a part of England, a notable percentage of those living in
Cornwall feel similarly, considering themselves
Cornish first. One significant exception is in Northern Ireland, where the
Unionist community tend to identify very strongly as "British" (
Republicans living in the province are more likely to consider themselves "Irish"), and there is not a "Northern Ireland" or "Northern Irish" identity to the same extent as there is (e.g.) a Scottish one.
A person, therefore, using the term "English" to describe him or herself (regardless of personal history) may be going out of his or her way to do so; hence he or she may also be seen (rightly or wrongly, and not necessarily pejoratively) as
nationalistic. While Scottish, Welsh, Irish and Cornish patriotism are widely exhibited, specifically English patriotism has often been viewed with suspicion, and most English people feel more comfortable identifying themselves with Britain as a whole. However, this may be to avoid being seen as bullies by their neighbours. The extent to which specifically English patriotism is linked to a right-wing xenophobic agenda has also generated discomfort. The appropriation of English symbols by racist far-right organisations such as the
National Front made many people uncomfortable with expressions of Englishness. In recent years, English identity has recently been a topic of debate in the national press, with many English people trying to "reclaim" the term and the flag from the far-right.
See English nationalism.
One notable exception to the above is in relation to sports, in particular
Association football,
Rugby football and to a lesser extent
Cricket. Transient successes are often accompanied by a revival of the use of the "
St George's Cross". While it has not yet replaced the "
Union Flag" its use is on the increase.
Many English people who have spent a lot of time overseas fall into the habit of referring to themselves as "English". It is the most recognisable designation by speakers of many languages, especially where their own language uses a similar word. Even in other English-speaking countries, people are often perplexed by concepts of "British" or the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
All these distinctions are only possible because there is no "English citizenship" or legal definition of Englishness. Moreover, the hazy understanding many people have of the distinction between "England" and "Britain" compounds the confusion. If in doubt, refer to an "English" person as "British": this will always be correct. It may not be as precise as "English", but it will avoid offence in the event the person is actually from a different part of Britain.
Culture
Union Flag
Main article: Culture of England
-
English literature
-
Sir Thomas Browne
-
Geoffrey Chaucer
-
John Milton
-
William Shakespeare
-
Jane Austen
-
Mary Shelley
-
Charles Dickens
-
Thomas Hardy
-
George Orwell
-
J. R. R. Tolkien
-
C. S. Lewis
-
Douglas Adams
-
List of national parks of England and Wales
-
Food and Drink
-
English folklore
-
English art
-
English school of painting
-
Music of England
Languages
Music of England.]]
As its name suggests, the
English language, today spoken by hundreds of millions of people around the world, originated as the language of England, where it remains the principal tongue today (although not officially designated as such). An
Indo-European language in
Anglo-Frisian branch of the
Germanic family, it is closely related to
Scots and
Frisian. As the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms merged into England, "
Old English" emerged; some of its literature and poetry has survived.
Used by aristocracy and commoners alike before the
Norman Conquest (1066), English was displaced in cultured contexts under the new regime by the
Norman French language of the new Anglo-French aristocracy. Its use was confined primarily to the lower social classes while official business was conducted in a mixture of
Latin and French. Over the following centuries, however, English gradually came back into fashion among all classes and for all official business except certain traditional ceremonies. (Some survive to this day.) But
Middle English, as it had by now become, showed many signs of French influence, both in vocabulary and spelling. During the
Renaissance, many words were coined from
Latin and
Greek origins; and more recent years,
Modern English has extended this custom, being always remarkable for its far-flung willingness to incorporate foreign-influenced words.
The law does not recognise any language as being official, but
English is the only language used in England for general official business. The other national languages of the UK (
Welsh,
Irish Gaelic and
Scottish Gaelic) are confined to their respective nations, and only Welsh is treated by law as an equal to English (and then only for organisations which do business in Wales).
The only non-
Anglic native spoken language in England is the
Cornish language, a
Celtic language spoken in
Cornwall, which became extinct in the 19th century but has been revived and is spoken in various degrees of fluency by around 3,500 people. This has no official status (unlike Welsh) and is not required for official use, but is nonetheless supported by national and local government under the
European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Cornwall County Council has produced [http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/cornish/strategy/english/engl01.htm a draft strategy] to develop these plans. There is, however, no programme as yet for public bodies to actively promote the language.
Scots is spoken by some adjacent to the Anglo-Scottish Border.
Most
deaf people within England speak
British sign language (BSL), a
sign language native to Britain. The
British Deaf Association estimates that 70,000 people throughout the UK speak BSL as their first or preferred language, but does not give statistics specific to England. Like Cornish, BSL has no official status, but has been granted a degree of recognition by the government. The
BBC broadcasts several of its programmes with BSL interpreters.
Different languages from around the world, especially from the former
British Empire and the
Commonwealth of Nations, have been brought to England by immigrants. Many of these are widely spoken within ethnic minority communities, including
Punjabi,
Hindi,
Urdu,
Bengali,
Gujarati,
Chinese and
Vietnamese. These are often used by official bodies to communicate with the relevant sections of the community, particularly in big cities, but this occurs on an "as needed" basis rather than as the result of specific legislative ordinances.
Other languages have also traditionally been spoken by minority populations in England, including
Romany.
Despite the relatively small size of the nation, there are a large number of dis